³í¹®¸í |
High-Performance Buildings ±¸ÇöÀ» À§ÇÑ ½Å±â¼ú ¿¬±¸ µ¿Çâ ¹× ¿¡³ÊÁö Àý°¨ È¿°ú Æò°¡ / Review of New Technologies¡¯ Energy Conservation Rate in High-Performance Buildings |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
±èöȣ ; ¾çÀÚ° ; À̽¾ð ; À¯±âÇü ; ±è°¼ö |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
KIEAE Journal, Vol.16 No.1(Åë±Ç 77È£) (2016-02) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(57) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(9) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
°í¼º´É °ÇÃ๰ ; ½Å±â¼ú ; ¿Ü±âÀü´ã °øÁ¶½Ã½ºÅÛ ; ¾×Ƽºê Ä¥µåºö ; ¹Ù´Ú°øÁ¶½Ã½ºÅÛ ; ¿¡³ÊÁö Àý°¨·ü ; High-Performance Building ; New Technology ; DOAS ; Active Chilled Beam ; UFAD ; Energy Saving Rate |
¿ä¾à2 |
The purpose of this study is to analyze the energy performance by applying new technologies for passive and active control. Method: We selected new technologies for passive and active control which are based on formal study by analyzing technology applied to the High-Performance Buildings in various countries. Also, we analyzed energy saving potential for each technologies by breakdown the result of the energy saving rates in detail. Result: For the wall and roof insulating methods, preceding studies showed that up to 21% energy could be saved by improving roof insulation and applying proper outside insulation compared to non-insulation. For the windows and glazing system, preceding studies showed that Low-E glazing system could save up to 11% energy compared to single glazing system. Studies about solar and daylighting controls revealed that effective daylighting dimming control could save 13% of energy compared to uncontrolled situation. Studies on DOAS (Dedicated Outdoor Air System) showed that about 23% energy could be saved compared to standard VAV system. Studies on the active chilled beam showed that about 25% energy could be saved compared to standard VAV system and studies of applying UFAD (Under Floor Air Distribution) could consume 31% less energy than applying overhead system. |