| 논문명 |
『조선건축』(1947-1949)에 나타난 사회주의적 인식과 건축 담론 / Socialist Perceptions and Architectural Discourse in Chosun Geonchuk (1947?1949) |
| 저자명 |
유인희(Yu, Inhee) ; 최성광(Choi, Sung-Kwang) ; 김현섭(Kim, Hyon-Sob) |
| 수록사항 |
대한건축학회논문집, Vol.41 No.11 (2025-11) |
| 주제어 |
사회주의; 사회주의적 건축; 근대건축운동; 조선건축; 해방기 ; Socialism; Socialist Architecture; Modern Movement in Architecture; Chosun Geonchuk; Post-liberation Periods |
| 요약1 |
본 연구는 『조선건축』(1947-1949) 수록 글들을 통해 해방기 한국 건축계의 사회주의 수용양상을 조명한다. 특히 진보적 건축인들의 논고를 중심으로 역사유물론, 주거권, 국가주도 계획경제 등 사회주의적 개념이 어떻게 재해석됐는지 분석한다. 연구 결과 식민지기 건축교육을 받은 젊은 세대는 마르크스주의와 일본 사회주의 건축론을 참조하며 서양건축사와 주택·토지 문제를 비판적으로 다뤘고, 이를 한국적 맥락에서 변용했다. 사회주의는 정치이념보다는 방법론적 도구로 활용됐으나, 건축 실천으로 이어지지 못한 채 분단 현실 속에서 단절됐다. |
| 요약2 |
After Korea’s liberation from Japan in 1945, architectural discourse began reflecting various ideological explorations, with socialism emerging
as particularly notable. Yet, compared to other fields, socialism in architecture has remained relatively underexplored. This study examines
how Korean architects in the post-liberation years perceived and incorporated socialist thought into architectural discourse. Drawing on articles
published in Chosun Geonchuk (1947?1949), it analyzes how socialist ideas ? especially Marxist historiography, housing policies, and
state-led planned economies ? were recontextualized. Findings reveal that young architects educated under the colonial system engaged with
Marxist and Japanese socialist architectural thought to critically examine architectural history, housing, and land reform in the Korean context.
Their writings redefined architecture as a tool for social transformation rather than as a mere aesthetic expression of the ruling class.
However, these perspectives rarely materialized in built form due to political suppression and limited resources. Instead of articulating a
concrete socialist program, they expressed aspirations for an ideal architecture through the language of socialism. Overall, socialist discourse
functioned less as a political stance than as a methodological tool, underscoring both the ideological diversity of post-liberation Korean
architecture and its unresolved pursuit of socially engaged practice. |
