| ³í¹®¸í |
³«»ó¿¹¹æ °üÁ¡¿¡¼ º» µµ¼Çü ¾îÃÌÁö¿ª °í·ÉÀÚ ÁÖÅÃÀÇ ÁÖ°ÅÀûÇÕ¼º Æò°¡ / Assessing the Residential Suitability of Elderly Housing in Coastal Island Communities from the Fall Prevention Perspective |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
ÀÌ¿¬¼÷(Lee, Yeun-Sook) ; Á¶½Â¿¬(Cho, Seung-Yeon) ; ÀüÀºÁ¤(Jun, Eun-Jung) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇѰÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý, Vol.41 No.8 (2025-08) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(61) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
¾îÃÌÁö¿ª °í·ÉÀÚÁÖÅÃ; ³«»ó¿¹¹æ; ÁÖ°ÅÀûÇÕ¼º; ÁÖ°Å ½ÇÅ Áø´Ü; »ç¿ëÀÚÇýÅà ±âÁØÀÌ·Ð ; Island Coastal Elderly Housing; Fall Prevention; Housing Suitability; Residential Condition Assessment; User Benefit Criteria Theory |
| ¿ä¾à1 |
º» ¿¬±¸¸ñÀûÀº ³«»ó ¿¹¹æ °üÁ¡¿¡¼ ¾îÃÌ Áö¿ª 65¼¼ ÀÌ»ó °í·ÉÀÚÀÇ ÁְŠȯ°æ ½ÇŸ¦ Áø´ÜÇϰí, °í·ÉÀÚÀÇ ½ÅüÀû¡¤½É¸®Àû ¿ä±¸¸¦ ¹Ý¿µÇÑ ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ °³¼± ¹æÇâÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú, °üÀý Áúȯ°ú ôÃß ÁúȯÀ¸·Î ³«»ó À§ÇèÀÌ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ¾ÈÀü ¼ÕÀâÀÌ ¼³Ä¡, ¹®ÅÎ Á¦°Å, »ýȰÀç Á¤¸®°¡ ¿ä±¸µÇ¾ú´Ù. »ç¿ëÀÚ ÇýÅà ±âÁØ ÀÌ·Ð ºÐ¼®¿¡¼ Çൿ ¿ëÀ̼º, Áö°¢Àû À¯Áö¿Í »ý¸®Àû À¯Áö ¼øÀ¸·Î ÁְŰ¡ °í·ÉÀÚÀÇ À̵¿¼º°ú ÀÏ»ó»ýȰ¿¡ Á¦¾àÀ» ÁÖ°í, ÀÎÁöÀû¡¤À§»ýÀû ¿ä±¸¸¦ ÃæÁ·ÇÏÁö ¸øÇϰí ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
South Korea faces growing challenges from population decline, an aging society, and industrial restructuring, contributing to the rise of declining and vanishing areas. In rural coastal regions with limited healthcare access, elderly residents often live in inadequate housing, exacerbating daily difficulties?especially the risk of falls. This study examines the residential suitability of elderly housing in isolated coastal villages, focusing on fall prevention using the User Benefit Criteria Theory. Data were collected from 30 elderly households on Yeonpyeongdo, randomly selected with support from the Urban Regeneration Support Center and the Residents¡¯ Association. In June 2023, individual interviews, housing assessments, and structured surveys were conducted using a fall prevention checklist. Results showed that 66% had joint-related illnesses, 43% had spinal conditions, and all households faced fall hazards, such as raised thresholds, slippery floors, and lack of handrails. Priority needs involved handrail installation and household item reorganization. According to the theory, Behavioral Facilitation was the most significant factor (61%), followed by Perceptual (22%) and Physiological Maintenance (15%). These findings suggest that current housing restricts mobility and functioning while neglecting cognitive and hygienic support. Tailored interventions should address both aging-related decline and the unique conditions of coastal areas, providing a theoretical basis for user-centered housing policy and integrated care strategies. |