| 논문명 |
유인우주기지 계획의 모듈 유형 이해 및 특성 분석 / Modular Typologies in Human Space Habitat Design |
| 저자명 |
이건일(Lee, Geon-il) ; 정수환(Cheong, Soo-hwan) ; 이세진(Lee, Se-jin) ; 백진(Baek, Jin) ; 이충헌(Lee, Choong-hun) ; 김경환(Kim, Kyung-hwan) ; 양현정(Yang, Hyeon-Jeong) ; 정준수(Chung, Joon-soo) |
| 수록사항 |
대한건축학회논문집, Vol.41 No.7 (2025-07) |
| 주제어 |
우주건축; 우주건축가; 유인우주기지; 모듈러; 유형 ; Space Architecture; Space Architect; Human Space Habitat; Modular System; Typology |
| 요약1 |
본 연구는 모듈 유형과 Class에 따른 기술적 분류를 중심으로 기 형성된 우주건축 사례들을 분석한다. 국제적 우주건축가 그룹인 SpaceArchitect.org이 사례들을 중심으로 Kennedy et al.(2007)의 분류체계를 통해 분석했다. 그 결과, 현재 가장 많이 계획된 모듈 형태는 기압에 대응하는 원통형과 구형이었으며, 기술적 분류로는 우주자원을 직접활용하는 3단계가 가장 활발히 계획되었다. 이러한 유형적 이해를 통해 향후 한국 우주건축 분야의 관심을 촉구하고, 추후 1,2 단계 계획 연구가 전략적으로 필요함을 밝혔다. |
| 요약2 |
This study examines global space architecture proposals, focusing on modular types and technological classifications. Although international
activity in this field is growing, South Korea's involvement remains limited in the early stages. Using data from international projects
archived by SpaceArchitect.org, the research analyzes modules based on two elements: the classification system by Cohen & Kennedy (1997,
p. 85) and exterior forms in relation to spatial constraints such as spheres, cylinders, and other shapes. Applying these typological criteria,
the study reinterprets relevant cases to identify key characteristics and distribution patterns, particularly the relationship between exterior form
and technological development. In terms of form, cylindrical and spherical modules are most common due to their efficiency in withstanding
pressure differentials. From a technological perspective, the classification reveals distinct differences across module types. Class 1 modules are
pre-integrated and ready for immediate use, but are limited by payload capacity. Class 2 modules consist of prefabricated components
requiring assembly, offering more adaptability. Class 3 modules rely on in-situ resource utilization and represent the most advanced stage of
space architecture, though they require significant technological progress. More than half of the reviewed cases fall into Class 3, indicating
that many space habitat concepts are currently speculative imagination. The findings highlight the need for a structured foundation in South
Korea's space architecture efforts, emphasizing the development of Class 1 and 2 modules as practical starting points for future progress. |
