| 논문명 |
학교 건물 내진보강에서 철골가새 대비 비좌굴가새의 효율성 비교 연구 / Comparative Study of Effectiveness of Buckling-Restrained Braces Versus Steel Braces on Seismic Rehabilitation of School Buildings |
| 수록사항 |
한국지진공학회 논문집, Vol.28 No.6(통권 162호) (2024-11) |
| 주제어 |
; School building; Seismic rehabilitation; Steel buckling restrained brace; Column failure mode; Shear strength ratio |
| 요약2 |
Steel brace is a popular option among seismic rehabilitation methods for school buildings, but it has a weakness in that the section area must be large enough to prevent buckling, so stiffness and strength are highly increased locally, and foundation reinforcing is required. On the contrary, BRB has strength that the steel core may be negligible since buckling is restrained, so the increase of stiffness and strength is insignificant, and foundation reinforcing may not be required. This study compared the effectiveness of both reinforcing methods for the seismic performance of school buildings by conducting both pushover and nonlinear dynamic analyses. Steel brace and BRB reinforcing may not be satisfied by nonlinear dynamic analysis, even by pushover analysis. This result is due to the school buildings' low lateral resistance and high column shear strength ratio. Suppose BRB can be regarded as a general rehabilitation method. In that case, BRB reinforcing is a favorable and economical option for school buildings with low column shear strength ratio since it can better satisfy performance objectives than steel brace by pushover analysis with a small steel core and no foundation reinforcing. |
