| ³í¹®¸í |
º¹ÇÕ»çȸº¹Áö½Ã¼³ÀÇ ±æÃ£±â Áö¿øÀ» À§ÇÑ °ø°£±¸Á¶·Ð ±â¹Ý »çÀÌ´ÏÁö ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¹èÄ¡ ¹× Æò°¡ / Arrangement and Evaluation of Signage System Based on Spatial Syntax for the Support of Wayfinding in Complex Social Welfare Facility |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.19 No.01 (2024-02) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(401) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
º¹ÇÕ»çȸº¹Áö½Ã¼³; ±æÃ£±â; »çÀÌ´ÏÁö ½Ã½ºÅÛ; °ø°£±¸Á¶·Ð; °¡½Ã¼º±×·¡ÇÁºÐ¼® ; Complex social welfare facility; Wayfinding; Signage system; Space syntax; VGA(Visibility Graph Analysis) |
| ¿ä¾à1 |
(¿¬±¸¹è°æ ¹× ¸ñÀû) »çȸº¹Áö½Ã¼³ÀÌ º¹ÇÕÈµÇ¸é¼ ±æÃ£±â Áö¿øÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, ƯÈ÷ °ø°£±¸Á¶¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ »çÀνýºÅÛÀÇ ¹èÄ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â º¹ÇÕ»çȸº¹Áö½Ã¼³ÀÇ ±æÃ£±â Áö¿øÀ» À§ÇÑ »çÀÌ´ÏÁö ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ÀûÀýÇÑ ¹èÄ¡¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿© Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î °Ç¸³ ÁßÀÎ º¹ÇÕ»çȸº¹Áö½Ã¼³ÀÇ »çÀΠü°è ¼ö¸³ ½Ã Ȱ¿ë¼ºÀ» °ËÁõÇØº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀÌ´Ù. (¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý) ¹ÙÀÌÁ(Weisman)ÀÌ Á¦½ÃÇÑ ±æÃ£±â ÀÌ·ÐÀ» Åä´ë·Î °ø°£±¸Á¶·ÐÀ» Àû¿ëÇÑ »çÀΠü°èÀÇ ¼³°è¿Í ½ÃÀμº¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡¸¦ º¹ÇÕ»çȸº¹Áö½Ã¼³À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ ÅëÇØ º¹ÇÕ»çȸº¹Áö½Ã¼³ÀÇ °ø°£±¸Á¶¿Í »çÀΠü°è °£ÀÇ °ü°è¼ºÀ» »ìÆìº¸¾Ò´Ù. °ø°£±¸Á¶·ÐÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© »çÀÌ´ÏÁö ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú °ø°£±¸Á¶¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ µÎ °¡Áö Ãø¸éÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æò¸éÀÇ ±¸¼ºÀº °ø°£±¸¹®·ÐÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °ø°£ÀÇ Á߽ɼº°ú º¸ÇàÀÚÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÆÐÅÏÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °¡½Ã¼º±×·¡ÇÁºÐ¼®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »çÀÎÀÇ ½ÃÁö°¢Àû Á¢±Ù¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿© Àç¹èÄ¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ÅëÇØ °³¼± È¿°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. (°á°ú) Æò¸é±¸¼ºÀû Ãø¸é¿¡¼ ÅëÇÕµµ¿Í ±¹ºÎÅëÇÕµµ°¡ º¹µµ¿Í ·Îºñ¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ º¸ÇàÀÚ°¡ ÀÌ º¹µµ¿Í ·Îºñ¿¡ ¹ÐÁýµÈ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» À¯ÃßÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î ±æÃ£±âÀÇ ´Ü¼¸¦ ÀÌ °ø°£¿¡¼ ¾òÀ» ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ¹æÇâ»çÀÎÀº º¹µµ¿Í ·Îºñ°ø°£¿¡ È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î ¼³Ä¡µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. 1Ãþ°ú 5ÃþÀº °ø°£±¸Á¶°¡ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ¸í·áÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Æ¼ °ø°£¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »çÀüÁ¤º¸°¡ ¾øÀÌ´Â ¿øÇÏ´Â ¸ñÀûÁö¿¡ µµ´ÞÇϱ⠾î·Á¿òÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î »çÀÎÀÇ Àû±ØÀûÀÎ ¼³Ä¡°¡ ¿ä±¸µÈ´Ù. ¹Ý¸é¿¡ 3Ãþ°ú 4ÃþÀº ¸í·áµµ°¡ »ó´çÈ÷ ³ôÀ¸¹Ç·Î »çÀι°¿¡ ¸¹ÀÌ ÀÇÁöÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Æµµ Àüü °ø°£±¸Á¶¸¦ ¸íÈ®ÇÏ°Ô ÀνÄÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇµÇ¾ú´Ù. °¡½Ã¼º±×·¡ÇÁºÐ¼®ÀÇ °á°ú´Â 1ÃþÀº ÁÖÃâÀÔ±¸¿Í ÀÎÁ¢ÇÑ ·Îºñ¿Í ¸ÞÀηκñ ¿ìÃø¿¡ º¹µµ¿Í ±³Â÷µÈ ÁöÁ¡ÀÇ °¡½Ã¿¬°áµµ°¡ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. (°á·Ð) °ø°£±¸Á¶·ÐÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© »çÀÌ´ÏÁö ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, »çÀÌ´ÏÁö ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» °³¼±ÇÏ´Â µ¥ Á¤·®ÀûÀÎ µµ±¸·Î Ȱ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. °ø°£ÀÇ º¹ÇÕÈ·Î ÀÎÇØ °¢ ´ÜÀ§°ø°£À» ¿¬°áÇÏ´Â º¹µµ°ø°£Àº °ø°£ÀÇ À§°è»ó Á߽ɿ¡ À§Ä¡ÇÏ¿© ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ°¡ ¹ÐÁýµÉ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ³ôÀ¸¹Ç·Î ¹æÇâ»çÀÎÀº ÅëÇÕµµ°¡ ³ôÀº º¹µµ¿Í ·Îºñ¿¡ ü°èÀûÀ¸·Î ¼³Ä¡µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ±×¸®°í °¢ ÃþÀ» ¿¬°è½ÃŰ´Â ¼öÁ÷À̵¿ÀåÄ¡´Â ÀÌ¿ë·ü°ú °¢ ÃþÀÇ ±â´ÉÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ¾È³»»çÀÎÀ» ¹èÄ¡ÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
(Background and Purpose) As social welfare facilities are becoming increasingly complex, directional support is required. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the appropriate arrangement of a signage system to support the wayfinding of complex social welfare facilities and to verify the utility of establishing a private system for complex social welfare facilities under construction. (Method) Based on the pathfinding theory proposed by Weisman, the design and visibility of a signage system applying the spatial structure theory were evaluated for complex social welfare facilities. Thus, we examine the relationship between the spatial structure of complex social welfare facilities and the signage system. By applying the spatial structure theory (space syntax theory and visibility graph theory), the relationship between sign and space was analyzed, focusing on two aspects. The composition of the plane was analyzed by focusing on predicting the center of space and the use pattern of pedestrians using spatial syntax. In addition, the improvement effect was analyzed by evaluating and rearranging the visual accessibility of the sign using visibility graph theory. This study focused on visual cognition in terms of connection with the space of the signage system; matters related to graphic design, such as color and shape, were excluded from the scope. (Results) In terms of plan composition, the degree of integration and local integration was high, centered on corridors and lobbies. The spatial structure of the first and fifth floors is relatively unclear, making it difficult to reach the desired destination without prior information about the space; therefore, active installation of private signs is required. However, the third and fourth floors were quite high, and it was found that the entire spatial structure could be clearly recognized without relying on private signs. The visibility graph analysis showed that the visible connection between the lobby adjacent to the main entrance and the point where the corridor intersected on the right side of the main lobby was the highest on the first floor. (Conclusions) It was confirmed that the signage system can be evaluated using the spatial structure theory, and this can be used as a quantitative tool to improve the signage system. Owing to the complexity of the space, the corridor space connecting each unit space is located at the center of the hierarchy of the space and is likely to be crowded with users; therefore, direction signs should be systematically installed in the corridors and lobbies with a high degree of integration. In addition, the vertical movement device connecting each floor should arrange the guide signs considering the utilization rate and function of each floor. |