| ³í¹®¸í |
¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´É, °æÁ¦¼º, »ç¿ëÀÚ ¼±È£µµ¸¦ °í·ÁÇÑ ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ¿ì¼± Àû¿ë±â¼ú µµÃâ ¹æ¾È¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸: ±¹°ø¸³¾î¸°ÀÌÁýÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î / A study on the Method of Priority Application Technology of Green Remodeling Considering Energy Performance, Economics and User Preference in Public Daycare Centers |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
¾ö¹ÌÇö(Mi Hyeon Eom) ; ¹Ú⿵(Chang Young Park) ; ¹Ú¼ºÇö(Seong Hyun Park) ; ÃÖâȣ(Chang Ho Choi) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
¼³ºñ°øÇÐ³í¹®Áý, Vol.36 No.03 (2024-03) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(137) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(13) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
°æÁ¦¼º Æò°¡; ¿¡³ÊÁö Àý°¨; ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µ; ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§; »ç¿ëÀÚ ¼±È£µµ ; Economic evaluation; Energy saving; Green remodeling; Priority; User preference |
| ¿ä¾à1 |
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â 2022³â °ø°ø°ÇÃ๰ ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ½Åû ´ë»ó Áß ±¹°ø¸³¾î¸°ÀÌÁýÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇöÀå ¹æ¹®À» ÅëÇØ ÀڷḦ ¼öÁýÇÏ°í ´ë»ó °Ç¹°ÀÇ ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´É °³¼± È¿°ú¿Í °æÁ¦¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´É, °æÁ¦¼º, »ç¿ëÀÚ ¼±È£µµ¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µ ¿ì¼± Àû¿ë±â¼úÀ» µµÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. (1) ÀÚ·á ¼öÁý °á°ú, 2022³â °ø°ø°ÇÃ๰ ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ±¹°ø¸³¾î¸°ÀÌÁýÀº ³Ã?³¹æ±âÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î È®ÀεǾú°í, âȣ, º®Ã¼´Ü¿, ¹Ù´Ú´Ü¿, ¹®, ÁöºØ´Ü¿, º¸ÀÏ·¯, ȯ±âÀåÄ¡, Á¶¸í, ž籤 ¼øÀ¸·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù. (2) ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀ» ÅëÇØ ¿¡³ÊÁö ¿ä±¸·®Àº Æò±Õ 30%, 1Â÷ ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼Ò¿ä·®Àº Æò±Õ 31% Àý°¨µÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. (3) ±¹°ø¸³¾î¸°ÀÌÁýÀÇ ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µ ÅõÀÚºñ´Â Æò±Õ 342,851,724¿ø, ÆíÀÍÀº Æò±Õ 2,147,523¿øÀ¸·Î »êÃâµÇ¾ú´Ù. À̸¦ ÅëÇØ ¼øÇöÀç°¡Ä¡·Î °æÁ¦¼º Æò°¡¸¦ ÁøÇàÇÑ °á°ú Æò±Õ ¼øÆíÀÍÀÌ -229,592,867¿øÀ̾ú°í, ´ëºÎºÐ ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¼øÆíÀÍÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ´Â °Ç¹°ÀÇ ³»¿ë¿¬¼öµ¿¾È ÅõÀÚºñ ȸ¼ö°¡ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù´Â ÀǹÌÀÌ´Ù. (4) ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´É, °æÁ¦¼º, »ç¿ëÀÚ ¼±È£µµ¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µ ¿ì¼± Àû¿ë±â¼úÀ» µµÃâÇÑ °á°ú ž籤, ȯ±âÀåÄ¡, º¸ÀÏ·¯, âȣ, ´Ü¿, ³Ã?³¹æ±â, Á¶¸í ¼øÀ¸·Î µµÃâµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÚ·á ¼öÁý Áß ±¹°ø¸³¾î¸°ÀÌÁý¿¡ ž籤 ¼³Ä¡°¡ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹Àº °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇµÇ¾î, ž籤À» Á¦¿ÜÇϸé, ȯ±âÀåÄ¡°¡ 1¼øÀ§·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù. (5)¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´É, °æÁ¦¼º, »ç¿ëÀÚ ¼±È£µµ¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î °í·ÁÇÏ¿© µµÃâÇÑ 1~2¼øÀ§ ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µ ¿ì¼± Àû¿ë±â¼ú(ȯ±âÀåÄ¡, º¸ÀÏ·¯)À» »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì¿Í ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µ ÄÁ¼³ÆÃÀ» ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¿ì¼± Àû¿ë±â¼úÀ» »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì ¿¡³ÊÁö Àý°¨·ü ´ëºñ ³·Àº ÅõÀÚºñ·Î ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀ» ÁøÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °ø°ø°ÇÃ๰ ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ¿¡³ÊÁö ºÐ¼®°ú °æÁ¦¼º Æò°¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ½ÇÈ¿¼ºÀ» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼, º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼ Á¦¾ÈÇÏ´Â ¿ì¼± Àû¿ë±â¼ú µµÃâ ¹æ¾ÈÀ» ÅëÇØ Àý°¨·ü ´ëºñ ³·Àº ÅõÀÚºñ·Î ±×¸°¸®¸ðµ¨¸µÀ» ÁøÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
This study derived benefits of green remodeling technologies that can be utilized in public daycare centers. Energy simulations were performed using ECO2-OD. Economic feasibility was evaluated using net present value to analyze expected effects of green remodeling. As a result of the analysis, primary energy consumption was reduced by an average of 31%. The average net benefit was -229,592,867 KRW. The ranking of green remodeling technologies was derived by considering energy savings, economics, and user preferences. Their rankings were placed in the order of PV systems, boilers, windows, insulation, air conditioners, ventilation systems, and lighting. Applying green remodeling technology priorities established by this study will allow us to implement green remodeling with higher energy savings and lower costs than current green remodeling consulting results. |