°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ|³í¹®Áý 2023³â 12¿ù

³í¹®¸í CVMÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ µðÁöÅÐ °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ °æÁ¦Àû °¡»ó°¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤ ºÐ¼® / Analysis on Economic Virtual Value Measurement of Digital Public Design Using CVM
ÀúÀÚ¸í ±è¼±¿µ
¹ßÇà»ç Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.18 No.08 (2023-12)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(391) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(8)
ISSN 1976-4405
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù °èȹ¹×¼³°è / µµ½Ã
ÁÖÁ¦¾î ÁöºÒÀÇ»ç±Ý¾×; °¡»ó°¡Ä¡Æò°¡¹ý; µðÁöÅÐ ¹Ìµð¾î; °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎ; °æÁ¦Àû °¡Ä¡ ; Willigness to Pay(WTP); Contingent Valuation Method(CVM); Digital Media; Public Design; Economic Value
¿ä¾à1 (¿¬±¸¹è°æ ¹× ¸ñÀû) 2016³â 2¿ù Á¦Á¤µÈ¡¸°ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ ÁøÈï¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹ý·ü¡¹Àº µµ½ÃÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû ÀÎÇÁ¶ó ¹× Á¶ÇüÀûÀÎ µµ½Ã°æ°üÀÇ ¾Æ¸§´Ù¿òÀ» Áß¿äÇÏ°Ô »ý°¢ÇÏ´ø °üÁ¡¿¡¼­, µµ½ÃÀÎÀÇ »î ÀÚü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àǹ̸¦ ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â °è±â¸¦ ¸¶·ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸´Â µ¿½Ã´ë¸¦ ¹Ý¿µÇÏ´Â µðÁöÅÐ °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ °¡»ó°¡Ä¡ ¼³°è ¿¬±¸¸ðÇü ¼³Á¤À» Á¶°ÇºÎ°¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤¹ýÀ¸·Î È°¿ëÇÏ°í, °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ °æÁ¦Àû °¡Ä¡¸¦ ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿© °¡±î¿î ¹Ì·¡¿¡ µµ½Ã°èȹ °ü·Ã Á¤Ã¥°ú Àü·«¿¡ À¯ÀǹÌÇÑ ½Ã»çÁ¡À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. (¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý) ¿¬±¸ ¹üÀ§´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, ¹®ÇåÁ¶»ç¿Í ¼±Ç࿬±¸¿¡¼­ ±¹³» °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ ÀÇ¹Ì¿Í Á¦1Â÷, Á¦2Â÷ °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎ ÁøÈï Á¾ÇÕ°èȹÀ» °íÂûÇÏ¿© XR °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ À§»óÀ» »ìÆ캻´Ù. µÑ°, Á¤È®ÇÑ ½ÃÀå°¡°ÝÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â °ø°ø¼­ºñ½º³ª °øÀÍÀû »ç¾÷¿¡ È°¿ëÇÏ´Â °¡»ó°¡Ä¡Æò°¡¹ýÀ» °ø°øµðÀÚÀο¡ Àû¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎ ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ÀÇ µ¿¿µ»óÀ» ¸¸µé¾î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¿¡ È°¿ëÇÑ´Ù. ¼Â°, WTP¸¦ ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿© CVM ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ¼³°è·Î °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ °æÁ¦Àû °¡Ä¡¸¦ ÃßÁ¤ÇÑ °¡Ä¡Æò°¡¸ðÇüÀ» Àû¿ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸¸ðÇüÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÑ´Ù. ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ýÀº ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ ¼³¹® ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ±¸ÇöÇϱ⠾î·Á¿ì¹Ç·Î °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎ ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ÀÇ µ¿¿µ»óÀ» ¾à 40ÃÊ µ¿¾È ½ÃûÇÏ¿© ¼³¹®Áö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇصµ¸¦ ³ôÀδÙ. (°á°ú) ¿¬±¸ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, °ø°øµðÀÚÀο¡ ´ëÇÑ °æÁ¦Àû °¡»ó°¡Ä¡¸¦ ÀνÄÇÒ¼ö·Ï ÁöºÒÀǻ簡 ³ô¾ÆÁ³À¸¸ç, »çȸÅë°èÇÐÀû º¯¼ö´Â 1% ³»¿Ü ¼öÁØ¿¡¼­ À¯ÀǹÌÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÃÆ´Ù. µÑ°, 1Â÷ Á¦½Ã°¡°ÝÀ» ¼ö¶ôÇϰųª °ÅºÎÇÑ ÀÀ´äÀÚµé °¡¿îµ¥ °¡Àå Àú·ÅÇÑ °¡°ÝÀÎ 1Â÷ ÀÌÈÄÀÇ Á¦½Ã°¡°ÝÀ» ¼ö¶ôÇϰųª °ÅºÎÇÑ ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀº °¡°ÝÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁú¼ö·Ï ÁöºÒÀǻ簡 ³·¾Ò´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ CVMÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ ¼±Ç࿬±¸¿¡¼­ Á¦½Ã±Ý¾×°ú ÁöºÒÀÇ»ç´Â ¹Ýºñ·ÊÇßÀ¸¹Ç·Î ºñ½ÁÇÑ ¸Æ¶ôÀ¸·Î ÀÌÇØÇÑ´Ù. ¼Â°, XR ±â¼úÀÌ °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­µµ ±âÇϱ޼öÀûÀ¸·Î È®ÀåÇÏ°í ÀÖ¾î µðÁöÅÐ µµ½Ã °ü·Ã ¼­ºñ½º¿¡ °ü½ÉÀÌ È®ÀåµÇ¾ú´Ù°í ºÐ¼®ÇÑ´Ù. (°á·Ð) ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á·ÐÀº ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, ±¹³» °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ Àü°³¸¦ °íÂûÇÏ¿© XR °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ À§»óÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÑ°, °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ °æÁ¦Àû °¡»ó°¡Ä¡ÃøÁ¤ ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇØ ½ÇÁ¦ »ç¿ëÀڵ鿡°Ô ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÇÏ¿© °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎÀÇ °´°üÀû ÁöÇ¥¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼Â°, °ø°øµðÀÚÀÎ ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ ÁöºÒÀÇ»ç¶ó´Â °æÁ¦Àû ÁöÇ¥·Î À¯ÀǹÌÇÑ °üÁ¡À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³Ý°, °ø°ø¼º, ½É¹Ì¼º, ¹®È­¼º, Á¤º¸¼º µîÀ» ±¸Ã¼È­Çϱâ À§ÇØ µðÁöÅÐ °ø°øµðÀÚÀο¡¼­ °æÁ¦Àû °¡Ä¡¸¦ ÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿ä¾à2 (Background and Purpose) The ¡°Act on the Promotion of Public Design,¡± enacted in February 2016, provided an opportunity to promote the meaning of urban life from the perspective of emphasizing the physical infrastructure of cities and the beauty of the formative urban landscape. Therefore, this study used a virtual value research model of digital public design that reflects contemporary thought as a conditional value measurement method and estimated the economic value of public design to present meaningful implications for urban planning-related policies and strategies in the near future. (Method) The research scope was as follows: First, we conducted a literature review of previous research to examine the status of XR public design by examining the meaning of domestic public design and the 1st and 2nd public design promotion comprehensive plans. Second, to apply the virtual valuation method used for public services or public-interest projects for which there is no accurate market price for public design, videos of public design content were created and used in surveys. Third, the WTP was set and analyzed by applying a valuation model that estimated the economic value of public design through a CVM scenario. An internet survey was conducted, as part of which a video of public design content was watched for approximately 40 seconds to improve understanding of the questionnaire. (Results) First, the greater the awareness of the virtual economic value of public design, the higher the willingness to pay; socio-statistical variables were significant at approximately the 1% level. Second, the respondents who accepted or rejected the first offer price had lower willingness to pay as the price increased. In most previous studies using CVM, the amount presented and willingness to pay were inversely proportional; the current results may be understood in a similar context. Third, interest in digital city-related services has expanded as XR technology has expanded exponentially in the public design field. (Conclusions) First, considering the development of domestic public design, the current status of XR public design was presented. Second, a survey was conducted with actual users to analyze the virtual economic value of public design, and objective indicators of public design were presented. Third, a meaningful perspective was confirmed as an economic indicator of willingness to pay in the field of public design. Fourth, the economic value of digital public design was evaluated in terms of publicness, aesthetics, culture, and information.
¼ÒÀåó Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
DOI https://doi.org/10.35216/kisd.2023.18.8.391