³í¹®¸í |
ÇØ¿Ü °í·ÉÄ£È ÁÖÅõðÀÚÀÎ °¡À̵å¶óÀΠƯ¼º ºÐ¼® / Characteristics of Global Age-Friendly Housing Design Guidelines |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
ȲÀ±¼ ; ÀÌ¿¬¼÷ ; ÀÓ¿¹Áö ; ÀüÀºÁ¤ |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.18 No.08 (2023-12) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(377) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(14) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
³ëÀÎ; °í·ÉÄ£È; Áö¿ª»çȸ Áö¼Ó °ÅÁÖ; À¯´Ï¹ö¼³µðÀÚÀÎ; ÁÖÅõðÀÚÀÎ °¡À̵å¶óÀÎ ; Elderly; Age-friendly; Aging in place; Universal Design; Housing Design Guidelines |
¿ä¾à1 |
(¿¬±¸¹è°æ ¹× ¸ñÀû) Àα¸ °í·ÉÈ´Â ±Û·Î¹ú Çö»óÀ¸·Î¼ ±Þ°ÝÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â ³ëÀÎÀÇ ¾ÈÀü°ú ÀÚ¸³»ýÈ°À» Áö¿øÇØÁÖ´Â °í·ÉÄ£ÈÀûÀΠȯ°æ Á¶¼ºÀ» À§ÇÑ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ½Çõ ÁöħÀÌ ¼¼°è ¿©·¯ ³ª¶ó¿¡¼ Á¦½Ã¡¤Àû¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. Çѱ¹ÀÇ °í·ÉÈ´Â OECD ±¹°¡ Áß °¡Àå ºü¸¥ Áõ°¡ ¼Óµµ¸¦ º¸À̸ç 2025³â °í·ÉÀα¸°¡ 20%°¡ ³Ñ´Â ÃÊ°í·É»çȸ¸¦ ÁøÀÔÀ» ¾ÕµÎ°í ÀÖ¾î °í·ÉÀÚ Áְź¹ÁöÁ¤Ã¥¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Ã±Þ¼ºÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó º» ¿¬±¸´Â Çѱ¹º¸´Ù ¾Õ¼ °í·Éȸ¦ °Þ¾î¿Â ÇØ¿Ü ¼±Áø±¹ÀÇ ÃÖ±Ù °³¹ßµÈ °í·ÉÄ£È ÁÖÅà µðÀÚÀÎ °¡À̵å¶óÀÎÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä Ư¼ºÀ» »ìÆ캸°í Çѱ¹Àû Çö½Ç¿¡ ¸Â´Â ÁְŸ𵨠°³¹ßÀ» À§ÇÑ ±âÃÊÀÚ·á Á¦°ø¿¡ ¸ñÀûÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. (¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý) ÃÖ±Ù °³¹ßµÈ ÇØ¿Ü °í·ÉÄ£È °¡À̵å¶óÀÎÀÇ ³»¿ëºÐ¼® ¿¬±¸·Î¼ À̸¦ À§ÇØ ¹Ì±¹(HomeFit Guide), È£ÁÖ(Livable housing Design), ¾ÆÀÏ·£µå(Universal Design Guidelines For Homes in Ireland)ÀÇ °í·ÉÄ£È ÁÖÅà µðÀÚÀÎ °¡À̵å¶óÀÎÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î µðÀÚÀÎ ÁÖ¿ä Ư¼ºÀ» ºñ±³¡¤ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ WHO °í·Éģȵµ½Ã °¡À̵å¶óÀÎ 8´ë ºÐ¾ß Áß ÁÖ°Å°ø°£ Áöħ¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â ¡®housing checklist¡¯¸¦ ºÐ¼® Ʋ·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. (°á°ú) ºÐ¼®°á°ú ¸ðµç ±¹°¡´Â Aging in place(AIP)ÀÇ ½ÇÇöÀ» À§ÇØ ³ëÀÎÀÇ Ãë¾àÇÑ ½ÅüÀû Ư¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ ÁÖÅðèȹ ¿ä¼Ò´Â ¹°·Ð ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¸ðµç »ç¶÷ÀÌ »ý¾ÖÁֱ⠺¯È¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Áö¿ª ³» °ÅÁÖ °¡´ÉÇÑ ÁÖÅÃ(AIP)À¸·Î¼ÀÇ ½ÃÀå°¡Ä¡(Affordability)¸¦ Áß½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ¡®HomeFit Guide¡¯´Â °ÅÁÖ ³ëÀÎÀÇ ÀÔÀå¿¡¼ ºÎ´ã¾øÀÌ ±âÁ¸ ÁÖÅà °³Á¶ ¹× À¯Áö°ü¸®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Ãø¸é¿¡¼ ÁßÁ¡À» µÎ¾ú°í, È£ÁÖÀÇ ¡®Livable housing Design Guidelines¡¯¿Í ¾ÆÀÏ·£µåÀÇ ¡®Universal Design Guidelines for Homes in Ireland¡¯´Â ½ÅÃà ÁÖÅðèȹ ¹× ½Ã°ø ½Ã ÃßÈÄ °ÅÁÖÀÚÀÇ ¿ä±¸¿¡ ¸ÂÃâ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °³Á¶ÀÇ ¿ëÀ̼º Ãø¸é¿¡¼ ´õ ¼¼½ÉÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ¾ÆÀÏ·£µåÀÇ °æ¿ì ÁÖÅÿ¡ ¿ø°Ý ÀÇ·á ¹× ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ±â¼úÀ» µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ÀÏ»ó»ýÈ° ¹× µ¹¹ß»óȲ °ü¸® ¼ºñ½º°¡ °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ¿´´Ù. (°á·Ð) °í·ÉÄ£È ÁÖÅÃÀÇ º¸ÆíÈ¿Í ÁÖÅð³Á¶ ½ÃÀåÀÇ È°¼ºÈ¸¦ À§ÇØ °¢ Áö¿ª Ư¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ Á¢±Ù°ú ³ëÀÎ Áְź¹Áö °ü·Ã Á¤ºÎ°ü°èÀÚ, Á¤Ã¥´ã´çÀÚ, ÁÖÅðèȹ Àü¹®°¡ ¹× ³ëÀÎÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ±³À° ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ºÎ°¢µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ´©±¸³ª ½±°Ô Á¢±ÙÇÏ°í Á¤º¸¸¦ È°¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Ç÷§Æû Áö¿øÀ¸·Î Á¤º¸ ±³·ù ¹× ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ µîÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀÚ¹ßÀû Âü¿© ÁõÁøÀÇ Á߿伺À» ½Ã»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
(Background and Purpose) The global phenomenon of population aging has prompted numerous countries to adopt and implement specific practice guidelines, aiming to cultivate an age-friendly environment conducive to the safety and independent living of the burgeoning older adult population. Among OECD nations, South Korea stands out with the fastest-growing aging population, poised to transition into a super-aged society with a projected elderly population of over 20% by 2025. This demographic shift urgently necessitates the formulation of housing welfare policies tailored to the specific needs of older adults in Korea. Consequently, this study endeavors to scrutinize the key attributes of recently developed age-friendly housing design guidelines from advanced nations that have confronted the challenges of aging before Korea. The goal is to furnish foundational data for the creation of housing models aligned with the distinctive realities of the Korean context. (Method) Employing a content analysis approach, this study delves into recently formulated age-friendly guidelines from overseas. The focus extends to housing design guidelines from the United States (HomeFit Guide), Australia (Livable Housing Design), and Ireland (Universal Design Guidelines for Homes in Ireland). The primary design characteristics are subjected to a comparative analysis using the 'housing checklist,' aligned with the residential space guidelines among the eight areas outlined in the WHO Age-Friendly City Guidelines. (Results) The analysis reveals a consensus across nations on the imperative consideration of housing planning elements geared towards accommodating the vulnerable physical characteristics of older adults, emphasizing the concept of Aging in Place (AIP). Furthermore, the significance of habitable housing, responsive to changes in the life cycle, is underscored, with an added emphasis on market value, particularly affordability. The 'HomeFit Guide' from the United States places a premium on enabling older adults residents to remodel and maintain existing homes without undue burden. In contrast, Australia's 'Livable Housing Design Guidelines' and Ireland's 'Universal Design Guidelines for Homes in Ireland' exhibit a meticulous focus on facilitating ease of modification during the planning and construction of new housing. Notably, Ireland introduces remote medical and monitoring technology into homes, enhancing daily life and emergency management services. (Conclusions) To propagate senior-friendly housing on a universal scale and invigorate the housing renovation market, there is a pressing need for a nuanced approach that considers the distinctive characteristics of each region. An education program targeting government officials, policymakers, housing planning experts, and older adults, related to senior citizen housing welfare, is paramount. Additionally, promoting voluntary participation is highlighted, facilitated through information exchange and monitoring supported by an easily accessible platform. |