°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ|³í¹®Áý 2023³â 8¿ù

³í¹®¸í ±¸Á¶ ¼º´É¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ½ºÇöóÀ̽º ½½¸®ºêÀÇ ¸®ºê ¹× ±æÀÌ¿¡ °üÇÑ Çؼ®Àû ¿¬±¸ / Analytical Study on Ribs and Lengths of Splice Sleeve Influencing Structural Performance
ÀúÀÚ¸í ÀÌ»ó¼·(Lee, Sang-Sup) ; ºÎÀ±¼·(Boo, Yoon-Seob) ; ½Å»ó¹Î(Shin, Sang-Min)
¹ßÇà»ç ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý, Vol.39 No.8 (2023-08)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(235) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(9)
ISSN 2733-6247
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù ±¸Á¶ / Àç·á
ÁÖÁ¦¾î ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ½ºÇöóÀ̽º ½½¸®ºê; ¸®ºê °£°Ý; ¸®ºê ´Ü¸é Çü»ó; ½½¸®ºê ±æÀÌ; À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÇؼ® ; Hybrid splice sleeve; Spacing of rib; Profile of rib; Length of sleeve; Finite element analysis
¿ä¾à1 ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ½ºÇöóÀ̽º ½½¸®ºêÀÇ ¸®ºê¿Í ±æÀÌ°¡ ö±ÙÀÌÀ½ ¼º´É¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÑ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÇؼ®¿¡ °üÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ³ª»ç½Ä°ú ±×¶ó¿ìÆ®½ÄÀÌ È¥ÇÕµÈ ±â°è½Ä ÀÌÀ½ ¹æ½ÄÀÎ ¿øÅëÇü ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ½ºÇöóÀ̽º ½½¸®ºê´Â ÀçÁúÀÌ SM45CÀÌ°í, ³»°æÀÌ 31.2 mmÀ̸ç, µÎ²²°¡ 4.3 mm·Î ¼±¹Ý °¡°øÀ¸·Î Á¦À۵Ǿú´Ù. Çؼ®¿¡ »ç¿ëµÈ ö±ÙÀÇ °­Á¾Àº SD600 D22À̾ú°í, ±×¶ó¿ìÆ®ÀÇ °­µµ´Â 100 MPaÀ̾ú´Ù. Çؼ®Àº Abaqus/ExplicitÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´°í, ö±ÙÀÇ ºñ¼±Çü °Åµ¿°ú ÆÄ´ÜÀ» ¸ð»çÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÁøÀÀ·Â°ú ¿¬¼º ¼Õ»ó Á¶°ÇÀÌ Æ÷ÇÔµÈ Àç·á ¸ðµ¨À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ö±Ù-±×¶ó¿ìÆ®-½½¸®ºê »çÀÌÀÇ Á¢ÃË »óŸ¦ ¸ðµ¨¸µÇϱâ À§ÇØ Áö¼öÇÔ¼ö·Î Ç¥ÇöµÇ´Â ¸é¾Ð-°ú¹ÐÂø °ü°è¿Í ¿îµ¿ ¸¶ÂûÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. Çؼ®º¯¼ö´Â ½½¸®ºê ¸®ºêÀÇ °£°Ý ¹× ´Ü¸é Çü»ó, ±×¸®°í ½½¸®ºêÀÇ ±æÀÌÀ̾ú´Ù. Çؼ®°á°ú ö±ÙÀÌ ÆĴܵǴ Æı«¸ðµå¸¦ ¾ò±â À§ÇØ ½½¸®ºê ¸®ºê °£°ÝÀº ö±Ù ¸®ºê °£°ÝÀÇ 2¹è ÀÌÇÏ·Î ÇÏ°í, ½½¸®ºêÀÇ ±æÀ̴ ö±Ù Á¤Âø±æÀÌ°¡ 6.0d ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ½½¸®ºê ¸®ºê Çü»óÀº ¹Ý¿øÇü, »ç´Ù¸®²Ã, Á÷»ç°¢ÇüÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î ½½¸®ºê-±×¶ó¿ìÆ® »çÀÌÀÇ ½½¸³¿¡ ÀúÇ×ÇÏ´Â ¼º´ÉÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
¿ä¾à2 This study aims to examine how the performance of mechanical rebar splices is impacted by the ribs and length of hybrid sleeves, utilizing
the finite element (FE) method. The cylindrical hybrid splice sleeve is crafted through machining, composed of SM45C material, featuring an
inner diameter of 31.2 mm and a thickness of 4.3 mm. In the FE models, the rebar¡¯s steel grade is SD600 with a diameter of 22 mm
(D22), while the grout¡¯s compressive strength is set at 100 MPa. To simulate the nonlinear behavior and fracture of the rebars, the analysis
employs the true stress-strain relationship and ductile damage conditions. Moreover, contact interactions between the rebar, grout, and sleeve
surfaces are modeled in Abaqus/Explicit using an exponential pressure-overclosure relationship and kinetic friction. The analysis parameters
under scrutiny encompass the spacing and profile of the sleeve rib and the sleeve length. Results indicate that the sleeve rib spacing should
not exceed twice the rebar rib spacing, and the sleeve length should be more than 6.0d to induce rebar fracture as the failure mode. When
considering the profile of the sleeve rib, the ability to resist slippage between the sleeve and grout is most effective in the sequence of
semicircular, trapezoidal, and rectangular shapes.
¼ÒÀåó ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
DOI https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2023.39.8.235
ºÐ¼®¼­Áö
°ÇÃ౸Á¶ > ö±ÙÄÜÅ©¸®Æ®±¸Á¶ > PC