³í¹®¸í |
¼ÁÅ×µå »ç¾÷ ¹× ¹üÁË¿¹¹æ ½Ã¼³¹°ÀÇ È¿°ú ¿¬±¸ / The Effectiveness of CPTED Projects and Crime Prevention Facilities |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
¿ÀÇÏ´Ã(Oh, Ha-Neul) ; ¼Õµ¿ÇÊ(Son, Dong-Phil) ; °¼®Áø(Kang, Seok-Jin) |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý, Vol.39 No.8 (2023-08) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(79) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
¼ÁÅ×µå; ¹üÁË¿¹¹æ ½Ã¼³¹°; ÇÖ½ºÆÌ ºÐ¼®; ¹öÆÛ ºÐ¼® ; CPTED; Crime Prevention Facility; Hotspot Analysis; Buffer Analysis |
¿ä¾à1 |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¼ÁÅ×µå »ç¾÷Áö¿ª¿¡ ¼³Ä¡µÈ ¹üÁË ¿¹¹æ ½Ã¼³¹°ÀÇ È¿°ú ¹× ¿µÇâ ¹üÀ§¸¦ ±Ô¸íÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÁøÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. 7°³ÀÇ ¿¬±¸ ´ë»óÁö¿ª¿¡¼ ÃÑ 351°³(13°³ À¯Çü)ÀÇ ½Ã¼³¹°À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î »ç¾÷ ÀüÈÄ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ¹üÁ˸¦ À¯Çüº°·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ý·Ð °üÁ¡¿¡¼ »ç¾÷Áö¿ª°ú »óÀ§ ÇàÁ¤µ¿ÀÇ ¹üÁËÁõ°¨·ü ºÐ¼®, »ç¾÷ ÀüÈÄ º¯ÈµÈ ¹üÁËÀ¯Çü°ú Hotspot ºÐ¼®, ½Ã¼³¹° ¹Ðµµ¿Í ¹üÁË ºÐ¼®, ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ ¹Ý°æº°·Î ¹ß»ýÇÑ ¹üÁË ºÐ¼®À» ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ¹üÁË ¹ß»ý ÁöÁ¡ Áß½ÉÀÇ Hotspot ºÐ¼®°ú ÇÔ²² ½Ã¼³¹° Áß½ÉÀÇ Buffer ºÐ¼®À» ÇÔ²² È°¿ëÇÑ °ÍÀº ±âÁ¸ ¿¬±¸¿Í Â÷º°¼ºÀ» °¡Áø´Ù. µÑ°, »ç¾÷ ÈÄ 1³â°£ 5´ë ¹üÁË °¨¼ÒÀ²Àº Æò±Õ ?61.0%¿´°í, 3°³ Áö¿ª¿¡¼ »ç¾÷ Àü¿¡ ºñÇØ ¹üÁË°¡ °¨¼ÒÇß´Ù. À̵é Áö¿ªÀÇ ¹üÁË °¨¼ÒÀ²Àº »óÀ§ ÇàÁ¤µ¿º¸´Ù ´õ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¼ÁÅ×µå »ç¾÷À» ÅëÇØ È¿°ú°¡ È®ÀÎµÈ ¹üÁË´Â Àýµµ ¹üÁË, ´ë¹° ¹üÁË, ³ë»ó ¹üÁË¿´´Ù. ¼Â°, ¹üÁË ¿¹¹æ ½Ã¼³¹°ÀÌ Àû¿ëµÈ Àå¼Ò¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ¹üÁËÀÇ ±ºÁý¼º°ú ¹ÐÁý¼º(Hotspot)ÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇß°í, ½Ã¼³¹°ÀÌ 3~4°³ ¼³Ä¡µÈ °¡·Î¿¡¼ ¹üÁË°¡ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¼öÁØ¿¡¼ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î 10m °£°ÝÀ¸·Î ½Ã¼³¹° Áß½ÉÀÇ Buffer ºÐ¼®À» ÁøÇàÇÑ °á°ú ¿µÇâ ¹üÀ§°¡ °¡Àå ±ä °ÍÀº CCTV ¾È³»Ç¥ÁöÆÇ(60m)°ú ¸¶À» ¿¡Æ¼ÄÏ Ç¥ÁöÆÇ(50m)À̾ú´Ù. ħÀÔ ¹üÁË¿¡´Â ¿Üº® ¹è°ü ħÀÔ ¹æÁö ½Ã¼³, ¾ÈÀü¸¶À» ¾È³»Ç¥ÁöÆÇÀÌ È¿°úÀûÀÌ°í, ³ë»ó ¹üÁË¿¡´Â °íº¸Á¶¸í, CCTV ¾È³»Ç¥ÁöÆÇ, ¹Ý»ç°æ, Àüº¿´ë Á¤ºñ ¹× À§Ä¡¹øÈ£ µîÀÌ È¿°úÀûÀ̾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í, ´ëÀÎ ¹üÁË¿¡´Â ÃâÀÔ¹® ¹Ý»ç½ÃÆ®, Àüº¿´ë Á¤ºñ ¹× À§Ä¡¹øÈ£°¡, ¾ß°£ ¹üÁË¿¡´Â °íº¸Á¶¸í°ú CCTV ¾È³»Ç¥ÁöÆÇ µîÀÌ È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÃÖ±Ù ¼ÁÅ×µå »ç¾÷¿¡¼ ¸¹ÀÌ Àû¿ëµÇ´Â ÃâÀÔ¹® ¹Ý»ç½ÃÆ®¿Í È¿°ú¿¡ ³í¶õÀÌ ÀÖ´ø º®¸é Á¤ºñ(µµ»ö Æ÷ÇÔ)ÀÇ °æ¿ì ÀÏÁ¤ ºÎºÐ ¹üÁË ¿¹¹æ È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖÀ½µµ È®ÀεǾú´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
This study aims to assess the effectiveness and scope of influence of crime prevention facilities implemented within the context of the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) project area. The analysis, which focused on 13 types of 351 facilities across seven research areas, studied crime patterns before and after the project. The research methodology encompassed various analyses, including crime rate changes in project areas and administrative dongs, alterations in crime types and hotspot distributions, facility density¡¯s correlation with crime, and crime analysis within a specific radius. This study innovatively employed a facility-centric buffer analysis coupled with hotspot analysis, distinct from prior research. The average reduction rate for the five primary crime types was -61.0% within one year. Crime decreased in three areas post-project, with a higher reduction rate compared to administrative dongs. The most effective areas in the CPTED project included theft or burglary, property crimes, and street crimes. Areas around crime prevention facilities exhibited diminished crime clusters and concentrations or hotspots. Statistically significant crime reductions were noted on streets with three to four installed facilities. Lastly, through a facility-oriented buffer analysis at intervals of 10 meters, this study identified the longest impact ranges of certain facilities. CCTV information signs and village etiquette signs displayed an impact range of 60 meters and 50 meters, respectively. External pipe intrusion prevention facilities and safety village information signs proved effective in deterring intrusion-related crimes. Meanwhile, logo-jecters, CCTV information signs, reflectors, and electric pole maintenance with location numbers demonstrated effectiveness in curbing street crimes. Additionally, door reflection sheets and electric pole maintenance with location numbers were found effective in reducing interpersonal crimes, and logo-jecters along with CCTV information signs were successful in addressing night-time crimes. In particular, door reflection sheets and wall maintenance including painting, which despite doubts about their efficacy, are extensively utilized in CPTED projects, and they have indeed demonstrated certain crime prevention effects. |