³í¹®¸í |
Åè À§½ºÄÞÀÇ °ÇÃà »ç°í·Î¼ÀÇ ¡®ÆòÆòÇÑ Á¸Àç·Ð¡¯ÀÇ °³³ä°ú °ÇÃàÀû ±¸Çö ¹æ¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / A Study on the Concept of ¡®Flat Ontology¡¯ as Tom Wiscombe's Architectural Thinking and its Application Method as an Architectural Design Methodology |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹¹®È°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Åë±Ç Á¦82È£ (2023-05) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(134) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
Åè À§½ºÄÞ; ÆòÆòÇÑ Á¸Àç·Ð; °´Ã¼ÁöÇâ Á¸Àç·Ð; ±â¹¦ÇÑ ºÎºÐÀüü·Ð; °ÇÃà »ç°í ; Tom Wiscombe; Flat Ontology; Object-Oriented Ontology; Strange Mereology; Architectural Thinking |
¿ä¾à2 |
Modern architecture's human-centered approach has reduced architecture to external relations, resulting in the loss of its autonomous nature and substance. Flat ontology and Object-oriented ontology(OOO) propose an alternative perspective, perceiving humans as one of many objects, which can lead to a new architectural design theory. Tom Wiscombe implements this approach by treating architectural elements as equal objects, departing from the traditional hierarchical classification system of architecture, to achieve autonomy in architectural design. This paper presents Wiscombe¡¯s implementation of the OOO approach to flat ontology through six case studies that exemplify the defining characteristics of their architecture. The results of these case studies are discussed and presented below. Wiscombe's architecture is defined by its flat ontology, which encompasses three distinct elements: a non-hierarchical relationship between parts and the whole, a novel formal vocabulary, and the use of tectonic fiction. In conclusion, by adopting a flat ontology perspective, he challenges the existing paradigm and promotes a new approach to architectural design. Accordingly, these findings have the potential to facilitate the development of new strategies for designing spaces that promote diversity and equity in a non-hierarchical manner. |