³í¹®¸í |
Á¤·®Àû °ø°£ºÐ¼® ±â¹ýÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ ÆÇ»óÇü¤ýŸ¿öÇü ¾ÆÆÄÆ® Æò¸é Ư¼º ºÐ¼® / The Plan Characteristics of Flat and Tower Type Apartments Using Quantitative Spatial Analysis Techniques |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
½ÅÁ¤Àº(Shin, Jeong-Eun) ; ÀÓÈ£±Õ(Lim, Ho-Kyun) |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý, Vol.39 No.4 (2023-04) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(57) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(11) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
ÆÇ»óÇü ¾ÆÆÄÆ®; Ÿ¿öÇü ¾ÆÆÄÆ®; °ø°£±¸¹®·Ð; °¡½Ã¼º ±×·¡ÇÁ ºÐ¼®; °ø°£ ±¸Á¶ ; Flat Type Apartments; Tower Type Apartments; Space Syntax; Visibility Graph Analysis; Spatial Structure |
¿ä¾à1 |
±¹³»ÀÇ °¡Àå ´ëÁßÀûÀÎ ÁÖ°ÅÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀÎ ¾ÆÆÄÆ®´Â ±¸Á¶ÀûÀ¸·Î ÆÇ»óÇü°ú Ÿ¿öÇüÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª µÎ À¯ÇüÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ´Â ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ¼±Çà ¿¬±¸µéÀº ¿¡³ÊÁö, ÀÏÁ¶·® µîÀÇ ºñ±³¿¡ ÁýÁߵǾî ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ º» ¿¬±¸´Â µÎ À¯ÇüÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû Â÷À̸¦ °ø°£±¸¹®·ÐÀ» È°¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ÕÀú, ÆÇ»óÇü°ú Ÿ¿öÇü ¾ÆÆÄÆ®ÀÇ °ø°£Àû Ư¼ºÀ» ÆľÇÇϱâ À§ÇØ °ø°£±¸¼º°ú °ø°£±¸¼º º° ¸éÀûºñ¸¦ ÆľÇÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× ÈÄ, µª½º¸Ê(Depthmap) ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» È°¿ëÇÏ¿© °ø°£±¸¹®·ÐÀÇ °¡½Ã¿µ¿ª(Isovist)°ú À§»ó¿¬°èµµ(J-Graph), °¡½ÃÅëÇÕµµ(Visual Integration)¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°¾Ò´Ù. ù°, °ø°£ ±¸¼ºÀûÀÎ Ãø¸é¿¡¼ ÆÇ»óÇüÀº ´ÜÁ¶·Ó°í Ÿ¿öÇüÀº ´Ù¾çÇÑ ±¸¼ºÀÇ Æ¯Â¡À» º¸¿´´Ù. µÑ°, °ø°£ ±¸¼º º° ¸éÀûºñÀ² ºÐ¼® °á°ú, ´Ù¸¥ °ø°£µé ¿¡¼´Â À¯ÀǹÌÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¹ß°ßµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÁö¸¸ °Å½Ç ¸éÀû°ú °ü·ÃÇؼ´Â Ÿ¿öÇüÀÌ ÆÇ»óÇüº¸´Ù À¯ÀǹÌÇÏ°Ô Å« ¸éÀûÀ» °®´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼Â°, °¡½Ã¿µ¿ª°ú °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© ÆÇ»óÇüÀº °¡½Ã¿µ¿ªÀÌ Àû°í, Ÿ¿öÇüÀº ½Ã°¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁöµÇ´Â ¿µ¿ªÀÌ ¸¹Àº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ³Ý°, À§»ó¿¬°èµµ ºÐ¼® °á°ú, ÆÇ»óÇüÀº ´Ü¼øÇÑ °ø°£ ±¸Á¶ÀÇ Å¸¿öÇüÀº º¹ÀâÇÑ °ø°£ ±¸Á¶ÀÇ Æ¯Â¡À» °®´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, °¡½ÃÅëÇÕµµ ºÐ¼® °á°ú, ÆÇ»óÇüÀº °³¹æÇü ±¸Á¶, Ÿ¿öÇüÀº Æó¼âÇü ±¸Á¶ÀÇ Æ¯Â¡À» °®´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ º» ¿¬±¸´Â °ø°£ÀÇ À§»óÇÐÀû Áß¿äµµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â °ø°£±¸¹®·ÐÀ» È°¿ëÇÏ¿© ÆÇ»óÇü°ú Ÿ¿öÇü ¾ÆÆÄÆ®¸¦ Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í, ±× Â÷ÀÌÁ¡À» ÆľÇÇÏ¿´´Ù´Â µ¥ ÀÇÀÇ°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
Apartments have become the most popular form of housing in Korea and are structurally classified into flat and tower types. Previous studies have mostly focused on comparing these two types as it relates to energy and sunlight. Therefore, this study aims to quantitatively analyze the structural differences between the two types using space syntax and visibility graph analysis. The area ratio by spatial configuration and spatial configuration was identified to understand the spatial characteristics of the flat and tower type apartments. After that, Isovist, J-Graph, and visual integration of space syntax were analyzed using a Depth map. The analysis results revealed the spatial composition of the flat type was monotonous and the tower type showed various characteristics of the composition. The area ratio by spatial composition had no significant difference in other spaces, but in the living room area, the tower type had a significantly larger area than the flat type. Concerning the Isovist, it was found that the flat type area had a few visible areas, and the tower type relatively had many visually recognized areas. The J-Graph analysis revealed that the flat type had the characteristics of a simple spatial structure while the tower type had the characteristics of a complex spatial structure. Finally, the visual integration analysis results showed that the flat type had the characteristics of an open structure whereas the tower type had the characteristics of a closed structure. This study was meaningful in that it quantitatively compared and analyzed the flat and tower type apartments using space syntax and visibility graph analysis to analyze the topological importance of space and identify the differences. |