³í¹®¸í |
¸®¸ðµ¨¸µ ´ë»ó ¾ÆÆÄÆ®ÀÇ ¼º´Éµî±Þ °üÁ¡ÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû Ư¼º°ú °ÅÁÖÀÚ ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ±âÃÊÀû ¿¬±¸ - ¼¿ï ¼Ò±Ô¸ð H ¾ÆÆÄÆ®ÀÇ »ç·Ê¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î - / A Basic Study on the Physical Characteristics and Resident Satisfaction in the Perspective of Performance of the Apartment to be Remodeled - Focusing on the Seoul Small-scale H Apartment - |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
KIEAE Journal, Vol.22 No.6(Åë±Ç 118È£) (2022-12) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(57) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
°øµ¿ÁÖÅÃ; ¸®¸ðµ¨¸µ; ¼º´É; °ÅÁÖÀÚ ¸¸Á·µµ ; Apartment Housing; Remodeling; Performance; Resident Satisfaction |
¿ä¾à2 |
Purpose: This study is to extract performance items that can evaluate resident satisfaction for apartments undergoing remodeling, and to investigate and compare resident satisfaction and physical performance with the items, and to further understand the interrelationship. Method: The research method establishes evaluation principles based on the remodeling certification standards, and sets evaluation items according to those principles. In addition, it evaluates remodeled apartments, confirms evaluation items, and conducts verification. Result: First, items that residents can subjectively evaluate were set and proposed. There are 22 items in 6 fields. Second, a satisfaction survey was conducted targeting apartment H residents using evaluation items. The average satisfaction level was 2.52. Third, as a result of evaluating the satisfaction evaluation items and physical performance, the overall physical performance level was found to be low except for some items, and most of them were at the lowest grade or below grade. Fourth, as a result of comparing physical performance and subjective satisfaction, it was found that physical performance and satisfaction were in a proportional relationship. As a result, this evaluation item is meaningful as an evaluation tool. |