| ³í¹®¸í |
ºñ±¸Á¶ ¿ä¼ÒÀÎ °ÇÃ౸Á¶¹°ÀÇ ÁöÁø´ëÀÀ´É·Â Çâ»óÀ» À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / Improved Earthquake Response Capacity of Nonstructural Elements of Building Structures |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
ÀÌÇå¼®(Lee, Heon-Seok) ; ¿À¸íȯ(Oh, Myung-Hwan) ; ±è¿ì¼®(Kim, Woo-Suk) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
º¹ÇսżÒÀ籸Á¶ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.13 No.04 (2022-08) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(1) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(8) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
ºñ±¸Á¶ ¿ä¼Ò; ÁöÁø´ëÀÀ´É·Â; Ŀư¿ù; 3Ãà À̵¿Çü ÆÐ½º³Ê; ½Ç´ëÇü ½ÇÇè ; non-structural elements; earthquake response capability; curtain wall; three-axis mobile fastener; full-scale test |
| ¿ä¾à1 |
±¹³» ÁöÁø ¹ß»ýÀÇ ºóµµ´Â Á¡Â÷ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â Ãß¼¼¿¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Æ÷Ç×ÁöÁø(5.4 ±Ô¸ð)Àº Áø¾ÓÁö¿Í ÁֹΠ°ÅÁÖÁö°¡ °¡±î¿ö ÇÇÇØ°¡ ½É°¢Çߴµ¥ °Ç¹°ÀÇ ¿ÜÀåÀç°¡ ¶³¾îÁ® Â÷·® µî¿¡ 2Â÷ ÇÇÇØ°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿© °Ç¹° ¿ÜÀåÀç ¾ÈÀü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ì·Á°¡ Ä¿Áö°í ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ºñ±¸Á¶ ¿ä¼Ò Áß Ä¿Æ°¿ùÀÇ µ¿Àû ³»Áø¼º´ÉÆò°¡ ±Ô°Ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼°è °¢ ±¹ÀÇ ±ÔÁØÀ» °íÂûÇϰí ÀÌ Áß¿¡¼°¡Àå ³Î¸® Åë¿ëµÇ´Â AAMA501. 6-18¿¡ µû¶ó ±× µ¿Àû ³»Áø¼º´ÉÀ» Æò°¡ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼ ¼öÇàÇÑ 3Ãà µ¿Àû ÁöÁøÆÄ´ëÀÀ °¡´É Ŀư¿ù ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ ÁöÁø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ 2Â÷ ÇÇÇØ ¹æÁö¸¦ À§ÇÑ ³»Áø Ŀư¿ù ¼³°è½Ã°øÁöħ °³¹ß¿¡ ±âÃÊÀû ÀÚ·á·Î Á¦°øÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
The number of earthquakes in Korea is rising constantly, and the Pohang earthquake (magnitude 5.4), which occurred close to where locals lived, caused significant damage. Therefore, the global standards for the dynamic seismic performance evaluation of curtain walls are considered among the nonstructural factors in this study. Additionally, the dynamic seismic performance is assessed using the popular AAMA501, which ranges from 6 to 18. Additionally, this study's three-axis dynamic seismic wave response-capable curtain wall system experiment aims to offer fundamental information for creating seismic curtain wall design and construction recommendations to stop secondary earthquake damage. |