| 논문명 |
스마트시티 활성화를 위한 추진전략 비교연구 / Comparative Study on Promotion Strategy for Smart City Activation |
| 수록사항 |
한국문화공간건축학회 논문집, 통권 제78호 (2022-05) |
| 주제어 |
스마트 시티; 지속가능성; 도시계획 전략; 문화예술; 시민체험; 도시인프라 ; Smart City; Sustainability; Urban Planning Strategy Strategy; Culture; Citizen Experience; Urban Infrastructure |
| 요약2 |
U-City, a smart city concept that appeared in Korea in 2000, meaning ‘a city equipped with a system that allowsinternet access anytime, anywhere’ received world attention and had a great influence on the expansion of Korea'stelecommunication infrastructure. However, the U-City project remained at a relatively fragmented level of public service and, asa result of frequent policy changes, the project scale was drastically reduced in 2014 and there were no major changes. Sincemost smart city projects in Korea are focused on new towns, the reality is that the development effect is not clearly revealed incitizen experiential level compared to other countries as the focus is on simply building systems and services in new townsrather than solving actual urban problems. The way to avoid repeating the failures of the previous U-City is to promote asmart city that can be established as a place to promote experience which citizens can enjoy. In order for a smart city tocooperate as well as flow naturally with AI, IoT and ICT technologies, and to be established as a creative and organic city, thestrategy should help for people to become accustomed to using smart technologies as well as data without any barriers.
The purpose of this study is to 1) find various understanding and progress of smart city master plans in Korea 2) collect andcompare promotion strategies for smart city in Korea, and 3) categorize smart city content strategies to activate smart city forcitizens. For this, the research method can be summarized as follows. First, the current status of domestic smart city plans isinvestigated through references, reports, and media. Second, the promotion strategies for domestic smart city plans are identifiedand compared. Third, the spatial content direction necessary for planning a citizen experiential smart city is presented. |
