³í¹®¸í |
»çȸÀûÈ¥ÇÕ ÁÖ°Å´ÜÁö¿¡ °üÇÑ ¼±Ç࿬±¸ ³»¿ëºÐ¼® / Content Analysis of Preceding Researches on Social-Mixed Housing Complex |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹ÁÖ°ÅÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý, Vol.32 No.3 (2021-06) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(71) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(11) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
»çȸÀû È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁö; °ÅÁÖÀÚÀνÄ; ÁְŸ¸Á·µµ; È¥ÇÕ¹èÄ¡À¯Çü ; Social Mixed Housing Complex; Resident Perception; Residential Satisfaction; Mixed Layout Types |
¿ä¾à1 |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â »çȸÀû È¥ÇÕ ÁÖ°Å´ÜÁö¿¡ °üÇÑ ¼±Ç࿬±¸¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °æÇâÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ°í »çȸÀû È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁö °èȹÀÇ ¹æÇâÀ» °³¼±ÇÏ°íÀÚ ¿¬±¸ ³»¿ëÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ¿¬±¸ÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. »çȸÀû È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁö¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀνĿ¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ºÐ¾ç¼¼´ë´Â È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁö¿¡ ´ëÇؼ ºÎÁ¤Àû ÀνÄÀÌ ¸¹¾Ò°í ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ÀνÄÀ» ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡µµ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀ̸ç Àû±ØÀûÀΠȥÇÕ¹æ½Ä¿¡ ´ëÇؼ´Â ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ÀνÄÀ» °®´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆľǵǾú´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í ´Þ¸® ÀÓ´ë¼¼´ë´Â È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁö¿¡ ´ëÇؼ ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ÀνÄÀÌ ¸¹Àº °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆľǵǾú´Ù. »çȸÀû È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁöÀÇ ÁְŸ¸Á·µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÑ °á°ú, ºÐ¾ç¼¼´ë´Â ÁְŸ¸Á·µµ°¡ ³·Àº °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ°í ÀÓ´ë¼¼´ë´Â ƯÈ÷ ¡®ÁÖµ¿³» È¥ÇÕ¡¯ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ÁְŸ¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆľǵǾú´Ù. È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁö ¼±È£¹èÄ¡À¯Çü¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇϸé È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁöÀÇ ÀÓ´ë¼¼´ë¿¡ °ÅÁÖÇÏ°í Àְųª ÀÔÁÖ¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ ¹èÄ¡À¯Çü¿¡ »ó°üÇÏÁö ¾Ê°Å³ª ¡®µ¿³»È¥ÇÕÇü¡¯, ¡®´ÜÁö³»È¥ÇÕÇü¡¯ µîÀÇ ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¼±È£ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ°í ±× ¹ÛÀÇ ºñÈ¥ÇÕ´ÜÁö, È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁöÀÇ °ÅÁÖ °æÇèÀÌ Àְųª ºÐ¾ç¼¼´ëÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡ ¡®µ¶¸³Çü¡¯À» ¼±È£ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆľǵǾú´Ù. È¥ÇÕ´ÜÁö¿¡¼ »çȸÀû ±³·ù ¹× ÀÌ¿ô°ü°è¿¡ °üÇؼ´Â ºÐ¾ç¼¼´ë¿Í ÀÓ´ë¼¼´ë »çÀÌÀÇ ÀÚ¹ßÀûÀÎ ±³·ù°¡ È°¹ßÇÏ°Ô ÀÌ·ç¾îÁöÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´õ¶óµµ ºñ´ë¸éÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡ ±¹ÇѵǴ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¿¬±¸ÀÚµéÀº ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ±Øº¹Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ÁÖ¹ÎÂü¿© ÇÁ·Î±×·¥, ÀÚÄ¡È°µ¿ µîÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
This study aims to investigate the research trends related to the social mixed housing complex and to analyze the outcome of the research based on resident perception, residential satisfaction, preferred mixed layout types and social interaction. As a research method, literature review was conducted on 49 preceding researches. The results are as follows. First, sale households tended to have a negative perception of social mixed housing. Even if social mixed housing was positively perceived, they would still negatively perceive the direct and active mixed-approach. In contrast, rental households had a relatively positive perception of social mixed housing. Second, residential satisfaction tended to be low for sale households, but high for rental households, especially for the ¡®building mixture type.¡¯ Third, when living in the rental housing and considering its occupancy, there was a tendency not to care about the type of arrangement or to prefer mixed layouts such as ¡®building mixture¡¯ and ¡®site mixture¡¯. Those with experience living in social mixed housing and sale households of social mixed housing preferred the ¡®separation type.¡¯ Fourth, voluntary social interaction between the sale households and the rental households were not actively conducted, and even if they were, they were limited to non-face-to-face interactions. |