°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

Çѱ¹¹®È­°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ|³í¹®Áý 2021³â 2¿ù

³í¹®¸í ¼Ò¿ì ÈÄÁö¸ðÅäÀÇ ÁÖÅÃÀÛǰÀ» ÅëÇØ »ìÆìº» °æ°è ÀÎÁö Ư¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / A Study on the Characteristics of Boundary Cognition through Sou Fujimoto¡¯s Residential Works
ÀúÀÚ¸í ÃÖÇüö; Á¤´ë¿µ½Äº°ÀúÀÚ; ±èÈñÁø
¹ßÇà»ç Çѱ¹¹®È­°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× Çѱ¹¹®È­°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Åë±Ç Á¦73È£ (2021-02)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(191) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(8)
ISSN 1738-818X
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù °èȹ¹×¼³°è / µµ½Ã
ÁÖÁ¦¾î ¼Ò¿ì ÈÄÁö¸ðÅä; °æ°è; ÀÎÁö; ÁÖ°Å; ¸ðÈ£¼º ; Sou Fujimoto; Boundary; Cognition; Dwelling; Ambiguity
¿ä¾à2 According to Fujimoto, ideal architecture describes a space where the boundaries between the interior and the exterior are ambiguous, establishing a relationship with the surrounding environment. Therefore, he focuses on inducing the impression that the boundary of the building is perceived imperfectly and that something can be interposed. The imperfection he refers to here allows users to recognize the boundaries vaguely but without forfeiting the basic function of the building. This study aims to clarify the characteristics of boundary perception revealed in Fujimoto¡¯s works to understand the principle of ¡°architecture that makes a relationship,¡± rather than simply analyzing the superficial features by categorizing his works. To this end, we analyzed the cognitive characteristics of perceiving boundaries vaguely and selected three examples representative of Fujimoto¡¯s residential works to reveal how he used them to blur the boundaries. Through this, it was recognized that the boundary itself is conventional, explicit, and absolute but can be perceived as creative, complex, and relative in users¡¯ cognitive process. Using these characteristics, it was confirmed that Fujimoto impinged on users¡¯ cognitive process through ¨ç the presentation of a new order, ¨è the compounding of the single, and ¨é the relativization of the absolute. Through this study, we hope to extend the boundary of space to the cognitive characteristics of humans who experience it, rather than limiting it to architectural elements.
¼ÒÀåó Çѱ¹¹®È­°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
ºÐ¼®¼­Áö
°ÇÃ࿪»ç ¹× ÀÌ·Ð > Çö´ë°ÇÃà ÀÇÀå·Ð

¡á Ãßõ¹®Çå (ÀÌ ¹®Çå°ú °°ÀÌ º» ¹®Çå)
·½ ÄðÇϽº¿Í Ä«Áî¿ä ¼¼Áö¸¶ °ÇÃà¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ Á¶Á÷°ú °ø°£±¸¼º ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ºñ±³ºÐ¼®
±Ç°æ¹Î ; ±èÁ¾Áø - Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý : v.16 n.6(Åë±Ç 65È£) (200712)
ÇÁ·Î±×·¥°ú ´ÙÀ̾î±×·¥ÀÇ Àû¿ëÀ» ÅëÇÑ °ÇÃà ÇüÅ »ý¼º ¿¬±¸
À±Çý°æ(Yoon Hae-Kyung) ; ±èÁÖ¿µ(Kim Ju-Young) ; È«¿øÈ­(Hong Won-Hwa) - ´ëÇѰÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.26 n.02 (201002)
¼Ò¿ì ÈÄÁö¸ðÅäÀÇ `»çÀ̰ÇÃà`¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
À̼¼¿µ(Lee, Sae-young) ; ±è¼öȯ(Kim, Soo-Hwan) - Çѱ¹¹®È­°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý : Åë±Ç Á¦60È£ (201711)
Äí¸¶ Ä˰í¿Í ¼Ò¿ì ÈÄÁö¸ðÅäÀÇ `¾àÇÑ °ÇÃà`¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸
Àå¿ë¼ø(Chang, Yong-Soon) - ´ëÇѰÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.30 n.6 (201406)
¼Ò¿ì ÈÄÁö¸ðÅä(Sou Fujimoto)ÀÇ ÀÛǰ¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³­ °æ°èÀÇ À籸¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
ÀÌÁøÈ­ ; ±è¼º¿í ; ÀüÀ¯Ã¢ - ´ëÇѰÇÃàÇÐȸ Çмú¹ßÇ¥´ëȸ ³í¹®Áý : v.33 n.1 (201304)
SANAAÀÇ °ÇÃà¿¡¼­ ¡®ºÐÀ§±â¡¯ÀÇ °³³ä°ú ±¸Çö¹æ½Ä
¼­Á¤ÀÏ(Seo Jeong-Il) ; ÀÓ¸®»ç(Lim Lisa) - ´ëÇѰÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.26 n.10 (201010)
[½Ã·Ð] 4Â÷ »ê¾÷Çõ¸í ½Ã´ë, °ÇÃàÀÇ ´ëÀÀ
À̸í½Ä(Lee, Myung-Sik) - °ÇÃà(´ëÇѰÇÃàÇÐȸÁö) : Vol.61 No.05 (201705)
°ÇÃà °ø°£ÀÇ °æ°è ¸ðÈ£¼º°ú Åõ¸í¼º
°í°æÈ£(KO Kyeongho) ; ±è´ö¼ö(KIM Duk-Su) - Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý : Vol.07 No.01 (201203)
¼Ò¿ì ÈÄÁö¸ðÅä °ÇÃà¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷È­ Ư¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
ÇÑűÇ(Tae-kwon Han) ; ±èÁÖ¿¬(Joo-yun Kim) - Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý : Vol.11 No.02 (201604)
¼Ò¿ì ÈÄÁö¸ðÅä °ÇÃà¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ºÒ¿ÏÀüÇÔ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸
ÃÖÇüö(Choi, Hyung-Chul) ; ±èÈñÁø(Kim, Hee Jin) - Çѱ¹¹®È­°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý : Åë±Ç Á¦75È£ (202108)