³í¹®¸í |
¹Ú¹°°ü °³¹æÇü ¼öÀå°íÀÇ Á¢±Ù¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ºñ±³ ºÐ¼® / Comparative Analysis of Accessibility of Museum Open Storage |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹¹®È°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Åë±Ç Á¦70È£ (2020-05) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(3) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
¹Ú¹°°ü; °³¹æÇü ¼öÀå°í; Á¢±Ù¼º; °ø°£±¸¹®·Ð; Àü½Ã°ø°£ ; Museum; Open Storage; Accessibility; Space Syntax; Exhibition Space |
¿ä¾à2 |
Recently, museums at home and abroad have been developing awareness to share an increasing number of collections with the public. It also means that various measures should be sought to expand access to the collection, as well as to collect and display it. Therefore, studies are actively being conducted on how to open storage, which is a taboo space. This opening is called open storage, visible storage, and is becoming increasingly prominent at home and abroad. Open storage is opening up previously banned spaces, creating a new paradigm of access to "exhibitions and watches" for visitors. Therefore, this study divided open storage view accessibility into exhibition form and type, and compared case views through VGA and AX analysis. The spatial composition of the analyzed case hall was divided into four types: water burial exhibition type, reference exhibition type, open storage type and complex type. Based on this, the accessibility was identified by finding visual connectivity and integration, and comparing the connectivity and integration of the visitor's circulation system through the axis. As a result, major exhibitions and viewing storage are heavily influenced by access and control by space location and operation. This allows efficient access through architectural cores and circular induction, even if open storage is invisible or hidden. This means that open storage can be the central node, even if it is not located on the main moving track, because the functions of the space are overlaid. Therefore, such diverse viewing of the open storage suggests that various architectural approaches and research are needed. |