³í¹®¸í |
±³Á¤½Ã¼³°ú °ÅÁÖ°ø°£: 1980³â´ë ÀÌÈÄ ¹Ì±¹ ±³Á¤½Ã¼³ÀÇ ¼ö¿ëµ¿ Æò¸é °èȹ º¯È¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î / Correctional Facility and Its Inhabitability: A Study on the Changes of Housing Unit Plan in the U.S. Correctional Facilities since the 1980s |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹¹®È°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Åë±Ç Á¦67È£ (2019-08) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(157) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
±³Á¤½Ã¼³; ±³Á¤ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ; °ÅÁÖ°ø°£; ¼ö¿ëµ¿; µ¥ÀÌ·ë; Áß°£º¸¾Èµî±Þ ; Correctional Facility; Correctional Paradigm; Inhabitable Space; Housing Unit; Dayroom; Medium Security Level |
¿ä¾à2 |
United States correctional facilities have been successfully transformed into an architectural language since the 1980s, with changes based upon the correctional paradigm preceded by the 1960s. In particular, these changes were concentrated in the housing units, the inhabitable space of the correctional facility. Accordingly, the planned characteristics of the housing units in the U.S. since the 1980s are: 1) rational planning of the dayroom and the cell, 2) efficient surveillance and working style, 3) natural lighting, 4) sharing of programs between the housing units. In particular, the State of Tennessee has been chosen as a research example because of its recognition for the need for facility reform since the 1980s and developed a prototype model through its own research and efforts. Therefore, in this study, the architectural planning characteristics of the U.S. housing unit were summarized more closely through the analysis of the medium-security level housing unit in Tennessee. Based on these analyses, the study compared and contrasted the status of domestic correctional facilities and examined the direction to be considered in future planning. When compared to the U.S., problems with domestic correctional facilities can be raised such as uniformity in the form of the housing unit, a lack of shared space and natural lighting, inefficient surveillance systems, and a lack of connectivity between functions. Therefore, the lessons learned from the U.S. case analysis are proposed to be adapted and applied to the situation in Korea. The details are as follows: 1) development of a prototype with a shared space plan and direct supervision system, 2) introduction of a team system, 3) planning considering the interconnection between functions. |