³í¹®¸í |
°³¹æÇü ¼öÀå°íÀÇ ¿î¿ë Ư¼º ¹× °ø°£±¸Á¶¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / A Study on the Characteristics of Managing and Spatial Structure of Open Storage |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹¹®È°ø°£°ÇÃàÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Åë±Ç Á¦67È£ (2019-08) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(9) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
¹Ú¹°°ü ¼ÒÀåÇ°; °³¹æÇü ¼öÀå°í; º¸ÀÌ´Â ¼öÀå°í; Àü½Ã À¯Çü ; Museum Collection; Open Storage; Visible Storage; Exhibition Type |
¿ä¾à1 |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±¹³»¿Ü ¸¹Àº ¹Ú¹°°ü¿¡¼ °³¹æÇü ¼öÀå°í ¹× º¸ÀÌ´Â ¼öÀå°í°¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖ´Â Çö»ó¿¡ ÁÖ¸ñÇÏ¿© ±¹³»¿Ü °³¹æÇü ¼öÀå°íÀÇ º¯È¿Í µ¿ÇâÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ¿© °ü·Ã ÀÖ´Â ÃÑ105°³°üÀ» Á¶»ç, ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ³í¹®ÀÌ´Ù. º» ³í¹®Àº °³¹æÇü ¼öÀå°íÀÇ Á¢±Ù¼º, º¸¾È, º¸Á¸, °ü¶÷ µ¿¼±°úÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ÆľÇÇÏ¿© °³¹æÇü ¼öÀå°í Çü½ÄÀ» ´ÙÀ½°ú °°ÀÌ ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. Áï, ¿¹¾à°³¹æÇü°ú Åõ¾îÇü, Àü½ÃÀÇ ¼öÀåÇü½ÄÀÎ ¼öÀåÀü½ÃÇü°ú ½ºÅ͵𰶷¯¸®Çü ±×¸®°í º¹ÇÕÇüÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ À̵é 5À¯ÇüÀÇ ´ëÇ¥»ç·Ê·Î ·çºí¶û½º, ´ÙÀ©¼¾ÅÍ, ²²ºê¶û¸®, ¸ÞÆ®·ÎÆú¸®Åº, ¾Èµå½ºÆ®·ëÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, À¯Çüº° º¸Á¸, º¸¾È¼º, Á¢±Ù¼º, Áֿ䵿¼±»óÀÇ °ü°è¼ºµî Áß¿äÇÑ °üÁ¡¿¡¼ Å« Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼ °³¹æÇü ¼öÀå°í´Â ÀÌµé °¡Áö ºÐ·ù¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÏ¿© °èȹÇÐÀû ½Ã»çÁ¡ÀÌ Á¤¸®µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆǴܵȴÙ. |
¿ä¾à2 |
This study focused on the phenomenon of open storage and visible store in many museums at home and abroad, and investigated and analyzed a total of 105 related stores to grasp the changes and trends of open storage. This paper analyzes the relationship among accessibility to open storage, security, preservation, and visitor circulation and classifies the open storage format as follows : Open-Reservation. tour-type, storage exhibition type, study gallery type and complex type. In addition, as representative cases five museums were analyzed : Luvre-Lens, Darwin Center, Musee du quai Branly, Metropolitan Museum of Art, and Museum An de Stroom. As a result, there were significant differences in terms of conservation, security, accessibility, and relationship between major circulations in these museums. Therefore, it is judged that open storage should be organized based on the classification of these views. |