| 논문명 |
사회복지시설의 이용대상자별 유형분석 및 복합화 모델 연구 / The Type Analysis and Mixed-use Model of Social Welfare Facilities according to the Users |
| 저자명 |
김영훈(Young-Hoon Kim) ; 박준영(Joon-Young Park) ; 조은길(Eun-Kil Cho) |
| 수록사항 |
KIEAE Journal, Vol.19 No.3(통권 97호) (2019-06) |
| 주제어 |
사회복지시설 ; 이용대상자 ; 유형분석 ; 복합화 모델 ; Social Welfare Facility ; User ; Type Analysis ; Mixed-use Model |
| 요약2 |
Purpose : It is necessary to classify the types of social welfare facilities divided into various categories and to identify the characteristics and to cope with new demands such as complexity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the type and characteristics of social welfare facilities that are subdivided according to individual laws and to propose a mixed-use model based on this analysis. The plan calls for the use of social welfare facilities as basic data when planning social welfare facilities or improving related laws and systems and producing guidelines. Method : First, the concept was set up by examining the theoretical and legal definitions of social welfare facilities. The present state of the social welfare facilities and policies were reviewed and the new types and architectural laws were reviewed. Second, we set the criteria of type classification, analyzed the types of users, operation method, and major functions. Third, we set up a classification system for each user and analyzed the main functions, spatial characteristics, and types for each user. Finally, we analyzed the characteristics of the type and derived a composite model. Result : This study classified the types of various social welfare facilities based on laws and precedent studies. Then, the composite model were derived by analyzing the characteristics of each type. Therefore, this study is meant to utilize it as basic data onto the construction plan of social welfare facilities. First, nine types of social welfare facilities were organized according to their operating modes and functions. Second, by analyzing the characteristics of social welfare facilities by type, duplicated or missing functions and facilities were derived. Third, by analyzing the characteristics of the subjects, two types of complexity models were derived. |
