| ³í¹®¸í |
¼ºê¹ÌÅ͸µ Àü·Âµ¥ÀÌÅÍ ±â¹Ý °Ç¹°¿¡³ÊÁö¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ÀԷ¼öÁغ° Àü·Â¼ö¿ä ¿¹Ãø ¼º´ÉºÐ¼® / Performance Analysis of Electricity Demand Forecasting by Detail Level of Building Energy Models Based on the Measured Submetering Electricity Data |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
½Å»ó¿ë(Shin, Sang-Yong) ; ¼µ¿Çö(Seo, Dong-Hyun) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹°ÇÃàģȯ°æ¼³ºñÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.12 No.6 (2018-12) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(627) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(14) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
¿ëµµº° »ç¿ë ; °Ç¹°¿¡³ÊÁö ¸ðµ¨ ; Àü·Â¼ö¿ä¿¹Ãø ; ¹ÌÅÍ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ; ¼ºê¹ÌÅ͸µ ; End Use ; Building Energy Model ; Electricity Demand Prediction ; Meter Data ; Submetering |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
Submetering electricity consumption data enables more detail input of end use components, such as lighting, plug, HVAC, and occupancy in building energy modeling. However, such an modeling efforts and results are rarely tried and published in terms of the estimation accuracy of electricity demand. In this research, actual submetering data obtained from a university building is analyzed and provided for building energy modeling practice. As alternative modeling cases, conventional modeling method (Case-1), using reference schedule per building usage, and main metering data based modeling method (Case-2) are established. Detail efforts are added to derive prototypical schedules from the metered data by introducing variability index. The simulation results revealed that Case-1 showed the largest error as we can expect. And Case-2 showed comparative error relative to Case-3 in terms of total electricity estimation. But Case-2 showed about two times larger error in CV (RMSE) in lighting energy demand due to lack of End Use consumption information. |