³í¹®¸í |
Åͺ¸ ³Ãµ¿±âÀÇ ±â°èÇнÀ ¸ðµ¨°ú ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¸ðµ¨ ºñ±³ / Machine Learning model vs. Hybrid model of a turbo chiller / Ãá°è-05. °ÇÃàȯ°æ¹×¼³ºñ |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
¹Ú¼ºÈ£(Park, SungHo) ; ¾È±â¾ð(Ahn, Ki Uhn) ; Ȳ½ÂÈ£(Hwang, Aaron) ; ÃÖ¼±±Ô(Choi, Sunkyu) ; ¹Úö¼ö(Park, Cheol Soo) |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇѰÇÃàÇÐȸ Çмú¹ßÇ¥´ëȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.38 No.1 (2018-04) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(408) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(2) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
Àΰø½Å°æ¸Á ; ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ¸ðµ¨ ; ±â°èÇнÀ ; ±×·¹ÀÌ ¹Ú½º ¸ðµ¨ ; Á¦ 1¹ýÄ¢ ±â¹Ý ¸ðµ¨ ; µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ±â¹Ý ¸ðµ¨ ; Artificial Neural Network ; Hybrid model ; Machine learning ; Grey-box model ; Physics-based model ; Data-driven model |
¿ä¾à2 |
In the previous research, the authors identified a valid range of inputs using Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and developed an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model for optimizing the operation of a turbo chiller in an offifce building. In this study, the authors developed a new hybrid model which is different from the gray-box model and compared it with the ANN model developed in the previous study. The hybrid approach is a kind of a data-driven model but it also uses minimal physical knowledge (physics-based regression equations from the EnergyPlus). It is found that the hybrid model performs closely to the ANN model (MBE=2.05%, CVRMSE=7.98%). It is believed that the hybrid ANN model can be applied for the wider range of inputs since it is data-driven and based on physical knowledge, which will be validated in future study. |