³í¹®¸í |
¼¿ï Á¾·Î ÁÖº¯ ¹ß±¼À¯Àû¿¡¼ º¸ÀÌ´Â Á¶¼± Áß¡¤Èı⠰ǹ°ÁöÀÇ Æò¸éÇü½Ä / The Plan Types of Excavation Remains during the Mid to Late Joseon Period around Jong-ro in Seoul |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
¹èâÇö(Bae, Chang-Hyun) ; ÀüºÀÈñ(Jeon, BongHee) ; ÇãÀ¯Áø(Huh, Yoojin) |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇѰÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è, Vol.34 No.05 (2018-05) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(79) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(10) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
Á¶¼±½Ã´ë °Ç¹°Áö ; Á¾·ÎÁÖº¯ ¹ß±¼À¯Àû ; Æò¸éÇü½Ä ; Åð ; ¹Ù´ÚÇü½Ä ; Building remains of Joseon period ; Excavation remains around Jong-ro ; Plan type ; Toi ; Floor type |
¿ä¾à2 |
The purpose of this study is to analyze the plan type of excavation remains during the Mid to Late Joseon period around Jong-ro area in Seoul. 523 building remains were selected in accordance with plan type could identified through the excavation investigation report. Among these, 276 building remains were verified to the 15-16th, 145 and 102 building were verified to the 17-18th and the 19th century. By classifying excavation remains, four dominant plan type of the each century came out. First, ¤Ñshape was the most common plan type took nearly 50 percent. In a considerable proportion of cases, this plan type seems an annex of main building. However, ¤Ñshape plan type also seemed to be used for main building in some cases. ¤¡ and ¤§shape plan type took the second and the third. In most cases, these types seemed typical plan used for a main housing building. For the last, ¤±shape plan type identified the most unusual. This plan type merely took under five percent but, these cases are meaningful because it shows the plan alteration from ¤§shape to ¤±shape plan type. Existence proportion between each plan types of the 15-16th century were continued to the 18-19thcentury without small changes between ¤Ñand ¤¡ types in 17-18h century. By examining selected excavation remains, installing front Toi space on ¤¡, ¤§ and ¤±shape plan type stand out clearly compared with ¤Ñshape plan type. From this tendency, it could be considered that plan type became a significant factor influenced installing Toi space. Similar to periodical tendency of plan type was not changed dramatically, the rate of installing Toi space in the 15-16th century was not changed much until the 18-19th century. It also shows the close relation between plan type and installing Toi space. In some excavation remains, floor type in the 15-16th century also verified. There are some points of similarities on installing typical location of On-dol, Ma-ru and Bu-eok in these excavation remains with later period housing type such as Ut-Bang-Gguk-Oem-Jib and Ddeul-Jib. |