| ³í¹®¸í |
±Í³ó¡¤±ÍÃ̸¶À»ÀÇ °øµ¿Ã¼ Ȱ¼ºÈ¿Í ÁÖ°Åȯ°æ°èȹÀÇ °ü°è ¿¬±¸ / Relationship between Community Promotion and Housing Environment Planning of Villages for Returning to Farm / 3-Çмú¹ßÇ¥1 |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
±è¹ÎÁÖ(Kim, Min-Joo) ; ÀÌ¿¬¼÷(Lee, Yeun-Sook) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ Çмú¹ßÇ¥´ëȸ ³í¹®Áý, Á¦20±Ç 1È£ (2018-05) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(49) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(3) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
±Í³ó±ÍÃÌ ; Returning to Farm |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
Interest in farming and fishing villages is growing. The number of people returning to farming and fishing villages increased from 400,000 in 2013 to 496,048 in 2016. The increase in the number of people returning to farming and fishing villages is essential for the development of rural communities through the strengthening of the local community. However, those who returned to farming and back home are having difficulties due to economic activities or conflicts with existing residents during their early settlement, and many residents of farming and fishing villages are not able to settle in new areas and are moving to other places. This means that not only the individual aspects of farming and fishing villages but also the entire society will incur costs. In this regard, it should be recognized that the new trend of returning to farming and fishing villages is no longer a policy that should be " promoted " but a matter of " support for settlement, " and that the residents of farming and village should be stabilized. |