| ³í¹®¸í |
ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷È °ø°£¿¡¼ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â À¯±âÀû Ư¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / A Study on Organic Characteristics of Self-organized Space |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.13 No.01 (2018-02) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(11) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(10) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
À¯±â¼º ; °ü°è¼º ; ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷È ; Çö´ë°ÇÃà ; °ø°£ ; Organic Characteristics ; Relationship ; Self-organization ; Contemporary Architecture ; Space |
| ¿ä¾à1 |
(¿¬±¸¹è°æ ¹× ¸ñÀû) 21¼¼±â º¹Àâ°è ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ ÇÏ¿¡¼ °ø°£µðÀÚÀο¡ ´ëÇÑ °üÁ¡ ¿ª½Ã º¯ÈÇϰí Àִµ¥, 20¼¼±â °ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÀÌ ÁÖ·Î ¹°¸®ÇÐÀ̳ª ±â°è·ÎºÎÅÍ ¸ðƼºê¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù¸é, Áö±ÝÀº º¹Àâ°è ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ ÇÏ¿¡¼ »ý¹°ÇÐÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ¸ðƼºê¸¦ ¾ò¾î ÄÄÇ»Å͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© À¯±âÀû Çü»óÀÇ °ø°£À» âÃâÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ³ª¾Æ°¡ º¹Àâ°è ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ¿¡ ³»ÀçµÈ ÀÚ¿¬ÀÇ »ý¼º Ư¼º°ú ±×°ÍÀÇ °ø°£Àû Àû¿ë¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂûÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ Á¦±âµÇ¸é¼, ƯÈ÷ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¹Àâ°è ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ¿¡ ³»ÀçµÈ »ý¼º Ư¼ºÀÇ ÇÙ½ÉÀ̶ó°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷ȸ¦ Åä´ë·Î À¯±âüÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» ¸ð¹æÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ °ø°£µðÀÚÀÎ ÀÛǰÀÌ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·±µ¥, ÀÌ´Â ÀÚ¿¬ ¼Ó¿¡ ³»ÀçÇØ ÀÖ´Â ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷ÈÀÇ ±Ùº»ÀûÀÎ ¿ø¸®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇØ¸¦ Åä´ë·Î ³ª¿Â °ÍÀ̶ó±âº¸´Ù´Â ´Ü¼øÈ÷ »ý¼º °úÁ¤ÀÇ ¿ø¸®¸¦ Â÷¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÚ¿¬À» ÇüÅÂÀûÀ¸·Î ¸ð¹æÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ÀÛǰÀÌ ´ëºÎºÐÀÌ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ÀÌ·¸°Ô º¹Àâ°è ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ ÇÏ¿¡¼ ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷ȸ¦ ÅëÇØ »ý¼ºµÇ´Â »ì¾ÆÀÖ´Â ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·Î¼ÀÇ °ø°£ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ´Ü¼øÈ÷ ÀÚ¿¬ÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀûÀÎ ¸ð¹æÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ ºÒÈ®Á¤¼ºÀ» Á¦¾îÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ °ø°£ µðÀÚÀÎÀ» ÅëÇØ ¿¸° ü°è·Î¼ ÀÚ¿¬°ú °°Àº À¯±âÀûÀÎ °ø°£À» »ý¼ºÇϱâ À§ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ º» ¿¬±¸´Â ºÒÈ®Á¤ÀûÀ¸·Î º¯ÈµÇ¾î°¡´Â Çö½ÇÀÇ »óȲ ¼Ó¿¡¼ ÀÚ¿¬¿¡ ³»ÀçµÈ »ý¼º Ư¼ºÀÎ ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷ȸ¦ ÅëÇØ âÃâµÇ´Â °ø°£ÀÇ À¯±âÀû Ư¼º¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºÐ¼®Çغ½À¸·Î½á ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷È °ø°£ÀÌ Çö´ë »çȸÀÇ ¿¹Ãø ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÑ ºÎºÐÀ» Á¦¾îÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¿¸° ü°è·Î¼ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö ±× °ø°£±¸¼ºÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀ» ±Ô¸íÇØº¸´Âµ¥ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. (¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý) ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀº 2Àå¿¡¼´Â ½Ã½ºÅÛÀû °üÁ¡¿¡¼ À¯±â¼ºÀÇ °³³ä°ú Ư¼º¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÇØ¼®ÇÏ°í ±× °ü°èÀû Ư¼º ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ µµÃâÇÑ´Ù. 3Àå¿¡¼´Â Çö´ë°ÇÃà°ø°£ÀÇ ±ÕÁúÈ ¹®Á¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇϳªÀÇ ÇØ°áÃ¥À¸·Î½á Çö´ë°ÇÃà°ø°£¿¡¼ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â »ý¼º °üÁ¡¿¡¼ÀÇ ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷È °³³ä°ú Ư¼º¿¡ ´ëÇØ °íÂûÇϰí ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷ÈÀÇ °ø°£È À¯Çü¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºÐ·ùÇØº»´Ù. 4Àå¿¡¼´Â 2Àå¿¡¼ µµÃâµÈ À¯±âÀû Ư¼º°ú ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷È À¯ÇüÀ» Åä´ë·Î ½ÇÁ¦ ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷È °ø°£ »ç·Ê¿¡¼ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â À¯±âÀû Ư¼ºÀ» À¯Çüº°·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á À̰ÍÀÌ Á¤¸» »ì¾ÆÀÖ´Â ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·Î¼ Çö´ë »çȸÀÇ ¿¹Ãø ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÑ ºÎºÐÀ» Á¦¾îÇϱâ À§ÇÑ °ø°£Àû °¡´É¼ºÀ» Á¦½ÃÇØ ÁÙ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»Áö ±Ô¸íÇØº¸°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. (°á°ú) Çö´ë°ÇÃàÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷ÈÀÇ À¯Çüº° »ç·Ê¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇØ º» °á°ú, ÀÚ±âÀÀÁýÀû Á¶Á÷È¿¡¼´Â À¯±âÀû Ư¼º Áß ÃÑüÀû ±¸Á¶ ºñÁßÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, ÀÚ±âÁõÆøÀû Á¶Á÷È¿¡¼´Â µ¿Àû °³¹æ ±¸Á¶°¡, Àڱ⺯¿ëÀû Á¶Á÷È¿¡¼´Â ºñ¼±ÇüÀû ±¸Á¶°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ¸ðµç À¯±âÀû ¿ä¼Ò°¡ °í¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö¸¸ ±× Áß Çǵå¹é ±¸Á¶°¡ °¡Àå Å« ºñÁßÀ» Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÈ´Ù. (°á·Ð) ÀÚ±âÁ¶Á÷Ȱø°£Àº µ¿Àû °³¹æÀ» ÅëÇÑ ºñ¼±ÇüÀû »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ëÀ¸·Î ÃÑüÀû ±¸Á¶¸¦ Çü¼ºÇϰí Àΰ£, °ø°£, ÀÚ¿¬ÀÇ Çǵå¹éÀ» À¯µµÇÏ´Â À¯±âÀû Ư¼ºÀ» ÅëÇØ Çö´ë »çȸÀÇ ºÒÈ®Á¤¼ºÀ» Á¦¾îÇϱâ À§ÇÑ »ì¾ÆÀÖ´Â ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·Î¼ÀÇ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÇØ¸íÇØº¸¾Ò´Ù. |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
(Background and Purpose) Perspectives on space design are changing in the wake of the re-emergence of the complex system paradigm in the 21st century. If the motives of space design in the 20th century were mainly inspired by physics or machines; a space for organic shapes is now being created, using computers and inspired by biology, under the complex system paradigm. The need to consider the development characteristics of nature inherent in the complex system paradigm, as well as the spatial application of such development characteristics has also been highlighted. More specifically, while a plethora of varied space design works emulating the characteristics of organisms based on the "self-organization" principle is appearing, the majority of such works are not based on an understanding of the fundamental principles of self-organization inherent in nature. Rather, these works imitate nature morphologically by simply adopting the principle of the creation process. However, the purpose of space as a living system?which is created through self-organization under the complex system paradigm?is to create an organic space akin to nature; that is, to create an open system through various space designs that places uncertainty under control, rather than simply imitating nature morphologically. As such, this study was conducted to determine if a self-organizing space can play the role of the open system required to control the unpredictable aspect of modern society. It did so by examining the potential of the space structure and analyzing the organic characteristics of space created through self-organization, a phenomenon inherent in nature. (Method) In Chapter 2, the concept and characteristics of an organism are interpreted from the systemic perspective, and its relational characteristics are derived from its interpretation. In Chapter 3, the concept and characteristics of self-organization are examined as a solution to the problem of the homogenization of contemporary architectural space from the generative position. In Chapter 4, the organic characteristics of the actual self-organized space cases are analyzed according to the organic characteristics derived from Chapter 2 and self-organizing types. The spatial potential of controlling unpredictable parts of modern society as a living system are also investigated. (Results) The results of analyzing organic characteristics through self-organizing types, can be categorized as follows: higher totality in self-aggregated organization, higher dynamic open structure in self-amplified organization, and higher nonlinear structure in the self-deformation organization. Overall, analysis revealed that the feedback structure had the largest proportion of organic characteristics in self organizing space. (Conclusions) This study found that self-organized space can form the total structure by non-linear interaction through dynamic openings; induce the feedback of human, space, and nature; as well as play a role as a living system in controlling the uncertainty of modern society through its organic characteristics. |