| ³í¹®¸í |
ÇöÀåÃøÁ¤À» ÅëÇÑ Áø°ø º¹Ãþâȣ¿Í ·ÎÀ̺¹ÃþâȣÀÇ Â÷À½ ¼º´É ½ÇÇè ¿¬±¸ / Experimental Study on the sound insulation performance of Vacuum Multi-layer glazing and Low-e Multi-layer glazing through field measurement |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
ÀÌ·ç´Ù(Lee, Ru-Da) ; ÃÖ¹ÎÁÖ(Choi, Min-Joo) ; À±Á¾È£(Yoon, Jong-Ho) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂȯ°æ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ Çмú¹ßÇ¥´ëȸ ³í¹®Áý, Åë±Ç32È£(v.17 n.1) (2017-05) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(66) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(2) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
Áø°øº¹Ãþâȣ ; ·ÎÀ̺¹Ãþâȣ ; À½Çâ °¨¼è°è¼ö ; Vacuum Multi-layer glazing ; Low-e Multi-layer glazing ; Sound reduction index |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
Studies on the thermal insulation performance of vacuum glazing have been research continuously, but studies on the sound insulation performance have been lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the sound insulation performance of vacuum duplex window and loi duplex window. Experiments were performed in a field-mock-up test cell constructed under the same conditions. As a result, it finds that the outcome is similar to outcome from standard. According to data, Low-e Multi-layer glazing is more efficient than Vacuum Multi-layer glazing in sound insulation performance (vacuum glazing's Rw=36, Low-e glazing was 41) |