³í¹®¸í |
°ÇÃà °ø°£ÀÇ °æ°è ¸ðÈ£¼º°ú Åõ¸í¼º / Boundary Ambiguity and Transparency of Architectural Space |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.07 No.01 (2012-03) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(141) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(9) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
°ÇÃà °ø°£ ; °æ°èÀÇ ¸ðÈ£¼º ; Åõ¸í¼º ; Architectural space ; Boundary ambiguity ; Transparency |
¿ä¾à1 |
Çö´ë°ÇÃà¿¡¼ ³»¡¤¿ÜºÎ °ø°£Àº ´õ ÀÌ»ó ÀÌÇ״븳ÀûÀÎ °ü°è°¡ ¾Æ´Ñ »ó´ë¼ºÀÌ µÎµå·¯Áø °ü°èÀû ¾ç»óÀ» º¸ÀÌ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¹®ÇåÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ °ÇÃàÀÇ ³»¡¤¿ÜºÎ °ø°£ °æ°èÀÇ ¸ðÈ£¼º°ú Åõ¸í¼º °³³äÀ» °ÇÃà °ø°£ ´ÙÀǼº ÀνÄÀÇ ±âÁ¦·Î ÆľÇÇÑ´Ù. °ÇÃàÀÇ ³»¿ÜºÎ °ø°£ °æ°èÀÇ ¸ðÈ£¼ºÀº: (1) ³»¿ÜºÎ °ø°£ÀÇ ÀüÄ¡; (2) °ã °ø°£ÀÇ µµÀÔ; (3) ¿¬¼ÓÀû °ø°£¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù. ³» ¿ÜºÎ °ø°£Àº Àΰ£ÀÇ ¿òÁ÷ÀÓÀ̳ª Áö°¢¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀνĵǴ °ø°£ °³³äÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °üÁ¡¿¡¼ º¸¸é °æ°è±× ÀÚü°¡ ¸ðÈ£ÇØÁ³±â ¶§¹®¿¡, °ÇÃàÀÇ °ø°£À» ¹°¸®Àû °æ°è¿¡ µû¶ó ±¸ºÐÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº Àǹ̰¡ ¾ø´Ù. ¿ÀÈ÷·Á °ø°£ÀÇ °³³äÀº ¸íÈ®ÇÔÀ» ³»Æ÷ÇÏ´Â °³³ä¿¡¼ ¸ðÈ£¼º¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ±× Àǹ̰¡ ´Ù¾çÇÏ°Ô È®´ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ³»¿ÜºÎ °ø°£ÀÇ Áö°¢Àº Åõ°ú¿Í ¹Ý»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇØ »ý¼ºµÈ ³»ºÎ¿Í ¿ÜºÎÀÇ Áßø À̹ÌÁö¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¸ðÈ£ÇØÁø´Ù. °á°úÀûÀ¸·Î, Åõ°ú¿Í ¹Ý»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁßøµÈ À̹ÌÁö´Â °üÂûÀÚ¿¡°Ô °ÇÃà°ø°£ÀÇ ´ÙÀǼºÀ» °æÇèÇÏ°Ô ÇÑ´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
The connection between internal space and external space in contemporary architecture noticeably shows relational aspects, not binary oppositions. This study, conducting a literature review, argues that the ambiguity of spatial(internal-external) boundary and transparency trigger the mechanism of spatial polysemy in architecture. The ambiguity of spatial boundary in architecture occurs in: (1) disposition of spatial relationships between internal space and external space; (2) introduction of double space; and (3) continual space. The cognition of internal and external space stems from human movement and perception. With this view, the boundary itself in contemporary architecture becomes ambiguous. The demarcation of architectural space by physical boundary is not appropriate. Rather, it shows transformation of the concept from obvious to equivocal meanings. The perception of internal and external space is unclear due to ambiguous images on skin superimposed by penetration and reflection. Consequently, it generates the spatial polysemy by boundary ambiguity and transparency, when an observer experiences internal space and external space. |