°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ|³í¹®Áý 2012³â 3¿ù

³í¹®¸í °ÇÃà °ø°£ÀÇ °æ°è ¸ðÈ£¼º°ú Åõ¸í¼º / Boundary Ambiguity and Transparency of Architectural Space
ÀúÀÚ¸í °í°æÈ£ ; ±è´ö¼ö½Äº°ÀúÀÚ
¹ßÇà»ç Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.07 No.01 (2012-03)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(141) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(9)
ISSN 1976-4405
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù °èȹ¹×¼³°è / µµ½Ã
ÁÖÁ¦¾î °ÇÃà °ø°£ ; °æ°èÀÇ ¸ðÈ£¼º ; Åõ¸í¼º ; Architectural space ; Boundary ambiguity ; Transparency
¿ä¾à1 Çö´ë°ÇÃà¿¡¼­ ³»¡¤¿ÜºÎ °ø°£Àº ´õ ÀÌ»ó ÀÌÇ״븳ÀûÀÎ °ü°è°¡ ¾Æ´Ñ »ó´ë¼ºÀÌ µÎµå·¯Áø °ü°èÀû ¾ç»óÀ» º¸ÀÌ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¹®ÇåÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ °ÇÃàÀÇ ³»¡¤¿ÜºÎ °ø°£ °æ°èÀÇ ¸ðÈ£¼º°ú Åõ¸í¼º °³³äÀ» °ÇÃà °ø°£ ´ÙÀǼº ÀνÄÀÇ ±âÁ¦·Î ÆľÇÇÑ´Ù. °ÇÃàÀÇ ³»¿ÜºÎ °ø°£ °æ°èÀÇ ¸ðÈ£¼ºÀº: (1) ³»¿ÜºÎ °ø°£ÀÇ ÀüÄ¡; (2) °ã °ø°£ÀÇ µµÀÔ; (3) ¿¬¼ÓÀû °ø°£¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù. ³» ¿ÜºÎ °ø°£Àº Àΰ£ÀÇ ¿òÁ÷ÀÓÀ̳ª Áö°¢¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀνĵǴ °ø°£ °³³äÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ º¸¸é °æ°è±× ÀÚü°¡ ¸ðÈ£ÇØÁ³±â ¶§¹®¿¡, °ÇÃàÀÇ °ø°£À» ¹°¸®Àû °æ°è¿¡ µû¶ó ±¸ºÐÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº Àǹ̰¡ ¾ø´Ù. ¿ÀÈ÷·Á °ø°£ÀÇ °³³äÀº ¸íÈ®ÇÔÀ» ³»Æ÷ÇÏ´Â °³³ä¿¡¼­ ¸ðÈ£¼º¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ±× Àǹ̰¡ ´Ù¾çÇÏ°Ô È®´ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ³»¿ÜºÎ °ø°£ÀÇ Áö°¢Àº Åõ°ú¿Í ¹Ý»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇØ »ý¼ºµÈ ³»ºÎ¿Í ¿ÜºÎÀÇ Áßø À̹ÌÁö¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¸ðÈ£ÇØÁø´Ù. °á°úÀûÀ¸·Î, Åõ°ú¿Í ¹Ý»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁßøµÈ À̹ÌÁö´Â °üÂûÀÚ¿¡°Ô °ÇÃà°ø°£ÀÇ ´ÙÀǼºÀ» °æÇèÇÏ°Ô ÇÑ´Ù.
¿ä¾à2 The connection between internal space and external space in contemporary architecture noticeably shows relational aspects, not binary oppositions. This study, conducting a literature review, argues that the ambiguity of spatial(internal-external) boundary and transparency trigger the mechanism of spatial polysemy in architecture. The ambiguity of spatial boundary in architecture occurs in: (1) disposition of spatial relationships between internal space and external space; (2) introduction of double space; and (3) continual space. The cognition of internal and external space stems from human movement and perception. With this view, the boundary itself in contemporary architecture becomes ambiguous. The demarcation of architectural space by physical boundary is not appropriate. Rather, it shows transformation of the concept from obvious to equivocal meanings. The perception of internal and external space is unclear due to ambiguous images on skin superimposed by penetration and reflection. Consequently, it generates the spatial polysemy by boundary ambiguity and transparency, when an observer experiences internal space and external space.
¼ÒÀåó Çѱ¹°ø°£µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
¡á Ãßõ¹®Çå (ÀÌ ¹®Çå°ú °°ÀÌ º» ¹®Çå)
·½ ÄðÇϽº¿Í Ä«Áî¿ä ¼¼Áö¸¶ °ÇÃà¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ Á¶Á÷°ú °ø°£±¸¼º ¹æ¹ýÀÇ ºñ±³ºÐ¼®
±Ç°æ¹Î ; ±èÁ¾Áø - Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý : v.16 n.6(Åë±Ç 65È£) (200712)
[½Ã·Ð] 4Â÷ »ê¾÷Çõ¸í ½Ã´ë, °ÇÃàÀÇ ´ëÀÀ
À̸í½Ä(Lee, Myung-Sik) - °ÇÃà(´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸÁö) : Vol.61 No.05 (201705)
ÇÁ·Î±×·¥°ú ´ÙÀ̾î±×·¥ÀÇ Àû¿ëÀ» ÅëÇÑ °ÇÃà ÇüÅ »ý¼º ¿¬±¸
À±Çý°æ(Yoon Hae-Kyung) ; ±èÁÖ¿µ(Kim Ju-Young) ; È«¿øÈ­(Hong Won-Hwa) - ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.26 n.02 (201002)
[ƯÁý] ±¹³» ģȯ°æ °ÇÃ๰ »ç·Ê ºÐ¼®
Á¤Áö³ª ; ±è¿ë¼® ; À̽¹Π- ±×¸°ºôµù(Çѱ¹±×¸°ºôµùÇùÀÇȸÁö) : v.9 n.1 (200803)
½Ã·Ð: Äڷγª ÀÌÈÄ, °ÇÃà°ú µµ½Ã°ø°£ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ »ý°¢ÇÏ´Ù
¹Ú¼ÒÇö - °ÇÃà°ú µµ½Ã°ø°£ : Vol.38 (202006)
°ÇÃࡤµµ½Ã°ø°£ÀÇ Çö´ëÀû °ø°ø¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ±âÃÊ ¿¬±¸
¿°Ã¶È£ ; ½É°æ¹Ì ; Á¶Áعè - ¿¬±¸º¸°í¼­(±âº») : 2008 n.8 (200902)
¾Æ¸ð·¹ÆÛ½ÃÇÈ »ç¿Á ¼³°è»ç·Ê
ÃÖµµ¼® - ¼³ºñÀú³Î(´ëÇѼ³ºñ°øÇÐȸÁö) : Vol.47 No.12 (201812)
Çö´ë°ÇÃàÀÇ Å¸ÀÚÀû °æ°è°ø°£¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
ÃÖ¼ø¼·(Choi Soon-Sub) ; ±èÇüÁØ(Kim Hyoung-Jun) ; Àü¿µÈÆ(Jeon Young-Hoon) ; ±è±¤Çö(Kim Kwang-Hyun) - ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.22 n.4 (200604)
SANAAÀÇ °ÇÃà¿¡¼­ ¡®ºÐÀ§±â¡¯ÀÇ °³³ä°ú ±¸Çö¹æ½Ä
¼­Á¤ÀÏ(Seo Jeong-Il) ; ÀÓ¸®»ç(Lim Lisa) - ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.26 n.10 (201010)
±¹³» Æнúê°ÇÃ๰ ¼³°è ¹× ½Ã°ø»ç·Ê
À̸íÁÖ - Çѱ¹±×¸°ºôµùÇùÀÇȸ Ãß°èÇмú°­¿¬È¸ ³í¹®Áý : (200911)