³í¹®¸í |
ÁÖ°ÅÁö¿ª ¼Ò±Ô¸ð º¸Çà·ÎÀÇ ¹°¸®Àû ȯ°æÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¹üÁË À§Çèµµ Æò°¡ üũ¸®½ºÆ®¿¡ °üÇÑ ±âÃÊ ¿¬±¸ / A Basic Study on the Checklists for Crime Risk Assessment in Physical Environment of the Pedestrian Passage at Residential Area |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
ÀÌÀ¯¹Ì ; ¹ÚÇöÈ£ ; °ºÎ¼º ; ¼º±âÈ£ ; ÀÓµ¿Çö |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
KIEAE Journal, Vol.16 No.3(Åë±Ç 79È£) (2016-06) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(47) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(9) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
¹üÁË¿¹¹æȯ°æ¼³°è ; º¸Çà·Î ; ¹üÁË¿¹¹æ ; üũ¸®½ºÆ® ; Æò°¡¹æ¹ý ; CPTED ; Pedestrian Passage ; Crime Prevention ; Checklist ; Assessment Method |
¿ä¾à2 |
Purpose: This study was aimed at providing the basic checklist as a means to assess the crime risk in physical environment of the pedestrian passage at residential area. Method: For this purpose, the preliminary checklists were selected according to the review of the precedent studies of checklists in exterior pedestrian passage. The usefulness and the importance of the preliminary checklists were analyzed through the seven expert group meetings, the 87 questionnaires survey of the crime experts & the architectural/urban experts, preliminary assessment and field survey. Results: The assessment categories of checklists were sorted into six types, i.e. spatial structure & function, lighting, landscaping, security facilities, other facilities and cleaning & maintenance. The 49 checklists were proposed according to the assessment categories. The final checklists were divided key checklists and general checklists based on the results of experts' weighting of each list item. There were significant differences between crime experts' weighting and architectural/urban experts' weighting in several checklists, i.e. dividing between pavements and streets, the brightness of light, white light |