| ³í¹®¸í |
°ÇÃ༳°è±³À°¿¡¼ ´ÙÁßÀǹ̸¦ °¡Áø ÇüÅ ¸ðµ¨¸µ¿¡ °üÇÑ BIMÀÇ È¿À²¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / A Study on the Efficiency of BIM on the Multi-Semantic Form Modeling in Architectural Design Education |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
È«½Â¿Ï(Hong, Seung-Wan) ; Á¶¹ÎÁ¤(Cho, Min-Jung) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹BIMÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.6 No.1 (2016-03) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(18) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(7) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
ºôµùÁ¤º¸º¸µ¨ ; ¸ðµ¨¸µÈ¿À²¼º ; ´ÜÀÏÀǹ̰´Ã¼ ; ´ÙÁßÀǹ̰´Ã¼ ; ÇüÅÂ¿Í Àǹ̰£ÀÇ Á¶ÇÕ ; °ÇÃ༳°è±³À° ; Building Information Modeling (BIM) ; modeling efficiency ; single semantic-embedded objects ; multi-semantic objects ; matches between forms and meanings ; architectural design education |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
While the advantages of BIM stem in the automatic and efficient assembling amongst the given, single semantic-embedded objects, it is still unknown the efficiency of BIM for developing the form that has more than one functions. To investigate the research question, in an authentic design course, the participants (N=38) assessed the efficiency of BIM when they designed a shop with the single semantic-embedded objects and multi-semantic objects. Independent T-tests reveal that in BIM, the use of the single semantic-embedded objects is statistically more efficient than that of multi-semantic objects (p<0.01). As the reason, in interviews, the participants reported that they had to split down the planned multi-meanings and assign only one meaning to one form in order to utilize the automatic assembling of BIM. Thus, they spent much effort and time for re-coordinating the match between the forms and multi-semantics. The findings of this study highlight the further directions of BIM in order to suit for the empirical practices of architects. |