| ³í¹®¸í |
°Ç¼³¿ë ¸®ÇÁÆ®ÀÇ ¿îÇàÁ¤º¸ ¹× °íÀåµ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÑ ÁÖ¿ä ºÎǰº° Á¡°ËÁֱ⠻êÃâ ¿¬±¸ / A Study on Optimal Inspection Interval for the Major Component sof Construction Lift |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
¼ÒÁöÀ±(Soh, Jiyune) ; ¹èÀçÈÆ(Bae, Jaehoon) ; ÇÑÃæÈñ(Han, Choonghee) ; ÀÌÁغ¹(Lee, Junbok) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.16 No.3 (2015-05) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(68) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(10) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
°Ç¼³¿ë ¸®ÇÁÆ® ; ¸®ÇÁÆ® À¯Áö°ü¸® ; ¼¾½Ì ; ¸®ÇÁÆ® ¾ÈÀü°ü¸® ; ¸®ÇÁÆ® Á¡°ËÁÖ±â ; Construction Lift ; Lift Maintenance ; Sensing ; Safety Management ; Lift Inspection Interval |
| ¿ä¾à1 |
ÃÖ±Ù ÃʰíÃþ °ÇÃ๰ÀÇ Áõ°¡·Î ±×¿¡ µû¸¥ ¾çÁß°èȹ ¹× ¾çÁßÀåºñÀÇ È¿À²Àû °ü¸®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ Áõ´ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. °Ç¼³ ÇöÀå¿¡¼Æø³Ð°Ô »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â Àüµ¿ È£À̽ºÆ®, Å©·¹ÀÎ µî°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ÀçÇØ»ç°í°¡ ºó¹øÈ÷ ¹ß»ýÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ °Ç¼³¿ë ¸®ÇÁÆ®´Â ¾ÈÀü Ãø¸é¿¡¼ Á¤±âÁ¡°ËÀ̳ª °íÀå¿¡ ´ëºñÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ´ë´ÜÈ÷ Áß¿äÇϳª »ç¿ë½Ã°£¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÏ·üÀûÀÎ Á¤±â°Ë»ç¸¦ ¼öÇàÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù .¸®ÇÁÆ®´Â°³º° ºÎǰÀÇ »ç¿ë½Ã°£ ¹× ºÎÇÏÁ¶°Ç µî¿¡ µû¶ó ±× ¼ö¸íÀÌ ´Þ¶óÁú ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ½ÇÈ¿¼ºÀÌ ¸Å¿ì ¶³¾îÁö´Â À¯Áö°ü¸® ¹æ¹ýÀ̶ó°í ÇÒ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦Á¡À» °³¼±ÇÏ°í »ç¿ëÀÚ ÆíÀǼº°ú ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» Áõ´ë½Ã۱â À§ÇÑ ¹æ¾ÈÀ¸·Î½á ¼¾½Ì ±â¼úÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿©¸®ÇÁÆ®ÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦ »ç¿ë½Ã°£À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í ±×¿¡ µû¸¥ °íÀåµ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ¸®ÇÁÆ®ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ºÎǰµé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °³º° Á¡°ËÁֱ⸦ »êÃâÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú¹°·Î ¸®ÇÁÆ®ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ºÎǰ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¡°ËÁֱ⸦ »êÃâÇϰí, ¸®ÇÁÆ® ½Ç »ç¿ë½Ã°£ 40½Ã°£, 90½Ã°£, 130½Ã°£, 400½Ã°£À¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ±×¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¡°Ë ºÎǰµéÀ» ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© Ç¥·Î ÀÛ¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ ÅëÇØ ¾ÈÀü»ç°í¸¦ ¹Ì¿¬¿¡ ¹æÁöÇϰí ÀÛ¾÷ÀÚÀǾÈÀü¼ºÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃÄÑ È¿À²ÀûÀÎ À¯Áö°ü¸® ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¸®ÇÁÆ® °íÀåÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ °ø±âÁö¿¬ ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ »çÀü¿¡ Á¦°ÅÇÏ¿© °ø»çÀÇ »ý»ê¼ºÀ» Áõ´ë½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù. |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
One of recent concerns for super-tall buildings is how to manage hoisting plans and equipment efficiently. Disasters are frequently occurred in relation to electromotive hoists and cranes which are commonly used in construction sites. For construction lifts, particularly, it is highly important to conduct regular inspections or prepare against breakdown in terms of safety. However, unfortunately the reality is that regular inspections are only flatly conducted according to operating hours only. A lift, whose life span is subject to the complicated considerations such as operating hours, loading condition, and the like of each component, is far too invalid as a means of maintenance. As a way to resolve this problem and improve its convenience and safety for users, this study intends to calculate individual inspection interval for the main components of lifts by measuring their actual operating hours with sensing technology and analyzing their historical data. The findings of study include calculation of inspection intervals for the main components of lifts and classification of components to check by the actual operating hours of lift (40, 90, 130, 400 hours), which are drawn up into tables. This will make an opportunity to suggest efficient maintenance measures by enabling prevention of safety accidents and enhancement of safety for workers. Also, it will lead to increasing productivity of works by eliminating sources of delaying the term due to the breakdown of lifts. |