| ³í¹®¸í |
ÄÁÅ×ÀÌ³Ê ÇϿ콺ÀÇ ±â¹Ð¼º´É Æò°¡ ¿¬±¸ / A study on the airtightness performance of container house. |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Ãß°èÇмú¹ßÇ¥´ëȸ, 2013 (2013-11) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(181) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(4) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
ºí·Î¿ìµµ¾î Å×½ºÆ® ; ±â¹Ð¼º ; ħ±â ; °¨¾Ð¹ý ; Blower door test ; Airtightness ; Infiltration ; Depressurization testing |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
Infiltration in building envelope is a major factor for increase in heating and cooling energy consumption in residential buildings. Use of shipping containers for converting into residential purposes is not very novel anymore. In Korea also, containers are being used for temporary living quarters and few ambitious projects but still it has not been streamlined for general construction. A container is basically a metal box but to convert it into a livable space, openings for utilities like power sockets, door and windows have to be made. So a container box may be air-tight but once it is converted into a living space, there are many nooks and crevices from which infiltration can occur. So, for a container house to be comfortable, this issue need to be properly addressed. In this study, "Blower door" testing has been used to check the air leakage in a container house. Air leakage in 6 cases have been tested where in Case 1 all the holes and openings have been sealed, in Case 2 only the power socket holes are opened and from Case 3-6, individual windows and door are opened in addition to power socket holes. The first 3 cases are leakage case A, Case 4 is C, Case 5 is D and Case 6 is E. Finally these cases are compared with the previous test results of ZeSH, a PassivHaus, a house in Chungnam, Korea, a house in Estonia and one in Finland. The results shows that a container house can be as good as any other houses it is compared with, where the infiltration of Case 6 is similar to ZeSH and all the other cases are better than the house in Finland. |