| ³í¹®¸í |
Åõ±¤Çü BIPV°¡ Àû¿ëµÈ ÀÌÁß¿ÜÇÇ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ °Ç¹°¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´ÉÆò°¡ / A Energy Performance Evaluation of Double Skin Facade system with Transparent BIPV |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Ãß°èÇмú¹ßÇ¥´ëȸ, 2012 (2012-10) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(145) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(6) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
ÀÌÁß¿ÜÇÇ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ; »ç¹«¼Ò °Ç¹° ; ¿°·á°¨ÀÀžçÀüÁö ; ¾Æ¸ôÆ÷½º ¹Ú¸· žçÀüÁö ; °Ç¹°ÀÏüÇü ž籤¹ßÀü ; ÀÚ¿¬Ã¤±¤ ; °Ç¹°¿¡³ÊÁö¼Òºñ·® ; DSF(ouble skin facade system) ; Office Building ; DSSC(Dye Sensitized Solar Cell) ; a-Si Thin Film Solar cell,BIPV(Building Intergrated Photovoltaic) ; Building Energy Consumption |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
Double skin facade can have better thermal performance in the winter season and can block direct solar radiation using the shading system in the summer season than the conventional single skin facade for higher quality office buildings. The office buildings equipped with the curtain wall mostly have significant electrical demand and thus BIPV(Building Integrated Photovoltaic) system which can generate electricity is highly efficient in achieving the energy saving in buildings. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the energy performance of building with Double skin facade integrated with BIPV system. An experimental Mock-up was established and measured data during a specific period(2012.5.21. to 5.28) were used to verify the simulation model EnergyPlus v6.0. Parametric study was categorized according to No-DSF Case; without double skin facade, Case 1; DSF with Single Clear, Case 2; DSF with a-Si BIPV, Case 3; with DSSC BIPV. The results indicate that Case 2 is the most effective in terms of indoor MRT(mean radiation temperature) during the winter time and Case 1 showed the best performance in the winter season. In terms of the cooling energy, Case 2 can provide the highest annual energy saving, regardless of implementing control strategies such as the blind operation, vent opening, and light control. |