°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ|³í¹®Áý 2012³â 10¿ù

³í¹®¸í TM À¯Çü Áß±¹½Ä ·¹½ºÅä¶ûÀÇ ÀüÅ뼺 Ç¥Çö Ư¼º ¿¬±¸ / A Study on the Characteristics of Traditionality Expression at TM Style Chinese Restaurants - Focused on Chinese Restaurants in Hong kong - / È«Äá¿¡ ¼ÒÀçÇÑ ·¹½ºÅä¶ûÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î
ÀúÀÚ¸í ±èÁöÀº ; ¿ÀÇý°æ
¹ßÇà»ç Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, v.21 n.5(Åë±Ç 94È£) (2012-10)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(280) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(9)
ISSN 12297992
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù °èȹ¹×¼³°è
ÁÖÁ¦¾î Áß±¹½Ä ·¹½ºÅä¶û ; Áß±¹ÀüÅëµðÀÚÀÎ ; ÀüÅ뼺 Ç¥Çö ; Chinese restaurant ; Chinese Traditional Design ; Traditionality Expression
¿ä¾à2 The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics of traditionality expressions at modernized Chinese restaurant in Hong Kong. As a case study, the study examined 12 modernized Chinese restaurants in Hong Kong. The gathered data were categorized and examined according to the ways of traditionality expressions, which included reproduction, transformation, and reinterpretation of traditional components. Each of the components was measured for the amount of traditional or modernity expression on a five-point scale. The five-point scoring system put an emphasis on tradition; 1 point was given to principal modernity(modernity: 90-100% + tradition: 0-10%), 2 points were given to principal modernity + auxiliary tradition(modernity: 70-90% + tradition: 10-30%), 3 points were given to the same ratio between tradition and modernity(modernity: 40-60% + tradition: 40-60%), 4 points were given to principal tradition + auxiliary modernity(modernity: 10-30% + tradition: 70-90%), and 5 points were given to principal tradition(modernity: 0-10% + tradition: 90-100%). The analysis performed according to those criteria and methodologies led to the following findings and conclusions: TM style, in which modernity was principal, usually did transformation and reinterpretation of traditionality. As for the design attributes of the styles, the TM style, they processed a majority of the spatial components as modern or reinterpretation of traditionality, which would be easily considered to be modern without careful observation, and applied a small amount of direct reproduction or transformation, which gives out a direct hint at traditionality, to attract more attention. Many of the spatial components did not express traditionality directly, expressing it indirectly or metaphorically. Traditionality was expressed in a small number of the spatial components, thus serving as a focus or impact point in the given space.
¼ÒÀåó Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
ºÐ¼®¼­Áö
°ÇÃà°èȹ ¹× ¼³°è > ºñÁְŰÇÃà °èȹ > »ó¾÷¡¤¾÷¹«½Ã¼³ °èȹ > ±âŸ

º» ³í¹®Àº Áß±¹½Ä(¶Ç´Â ÁßÈ­) ·¹½ºÅä¶û ½Ã¼³ÀÌ °ø°£±¸Á¶Àû, Àå½ÄÀû Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ Áö´Ï´Â ÀüÅ뼺 Ç¥Çö Ư¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ¸ñÀûÀ» µÎ°í ÀÖ´Ù. TM(Traditional Modern) À¯ÇüÀº Áß±¹½Ä ·¹½ºÅä¶ûÀ̸鼭 ÀüÅ뼺 Ç¥ÇöÀÇ Á¤µµ°¡ Çö´ë¼º Ç¥ÇöÀÇ Á¤µµ¿¡ ºñÇØ ¾àÇÑ À¯ÇüÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ TM À¯Çü¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ´Â È«Äá ¼ÒÀç 12°³ ·¹½ºÅä¶û »ç·Ê¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.