| ³í¹®¸í |
EnergyPlus¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¹Ù´Ú°øÁ¶½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¸ðµ¨¸µ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿¡³ÊÁö ¼º´É ºñ±³ / Comparison on the Energy Performance of Underfloor Air Distribution System According to Modeling Method Using EnergyPlus |
| ÀúÀÚ¸í |
ÀåÇâÀÎ (Hyang-In Jang) ; À±¼ºÈÆ(Seong-Hoon Yoon) ; ÀÌÇö¼ö (Hyun-Soo Lee) ; ¼½ÂÁ÷(Seung-Jik Suh) |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
¼³ºñ°øÇÐ³í¹®Áý, Vol.24 No.10 (2012-10) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(718) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(6) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
¹Ù´Ú°øÁ¶½Ã½ºÅÛ ; ¿¡³ÊÁö¼º´É ; ¸ðµ¨¸µ¹æ¹ý ; ¿¡³ÊÁöÇ÷¯½º ; Underfloor Air Distribution System ; Energy Performance ; Modeling Method ; EnergyPlus |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
The purpose of this study is to propose modeling method of Underfloor Air Distribution System with reliability and validity by comparing characteristics of modeling methods. For this, the modeling methods of UFAD were selected by investigating various modeling methods of previous researches. Then, simulations were conducted by using EnergyPlus which is dynamic analysis program of building energy. Annual energy consumption for each method was compared with a wide range of indoor thermal loads. As a result, the methodology of reducing internal gains can cause under sizing of the system. It suggests modeling methods to reflect occupied zone air-conditioning, temperature stratification and supply plenum which are the main characteristics of UFAD. |