°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ|³í¹®Áý 2012³â 2¿ù

³í¹®¸í Analysis of Quality Improvement Priority for Construction PMIS
ÀúÀÚ¸í An, Hyo-Kyung ; Lee, Seul-Ki ; Lee, Hyoung-Lak ; Yu, Jung-Ho
¹ßÇà»ç Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, v.12 n.1 (2012-02)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(10) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(12)
ISSN 15982033
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù ½Ã°ø(Àû»ê)
ÁÖÁ¦¾î ; project management information system ; priority index ; quality improvement
¿ä¾à2 As one of the key IT applications, the project management information system (PMIS) played a significant role in construction management processes in Korea. On increasing use of PMIS, regular quality assessment to identify user¡®s requirements of PMIS is necessary. However, there have been rare research efforts for quality assessment for the construction PMIS. This paper aims to propose a priority index of quality improvement for construction PMIS using the importance and satisfaction measures and to verify the discrimination power of the priority index by comparing it with other quality improvement priority index. In addition, this paper discusses some possible ways of PMIS quality improvement. The analysis of quality improvement priority was based on a questionnaire responded by 253 PMIS users (construction managers and constructors). The methods of PMIS improvement were based on the interviews with eight experts. These findings would be the foundation of further researches on PMIS quality improvement. However, more efforts are required to enhance the priority index, in terms of reflecting weighted values of quality assessment factors.
¼ÒÀåó Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
ºÐ¼®¼­Áö
°Ç¼³°ü¸® > °Ç¼³Á¤º¸È­

ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â Á߿䵵¿Í ¸¸Á·µµ Æò°¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ °Ç¼³PMISÀÇ Ç°ÁúÇâ»óÀ» À§ÇÑ priority index¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ´Ù¸¥ ǰÁú Çâ»ó priority index¿ÍÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ ÅëÇØ Á¦½ÃÇÑ priority indexÀÇ º¯º°µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.