| ³í¹®¸í |
âȣÀÇ Åõ°úÀ²°ú ºí¶óÀÎµå ½½·§°¢µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ ºûȯ°æ ¹× ¿¡³ÊÁö¼º´É ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸ / Comparative Studies on Lighting Environment and Energy Performance depending on the Transmittance of Window and Slat Angle of Blind / Çмú¹ßÇ¥ |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹Å¾翡³ÊÁöÇÐȸ Ãß°èÇмú¹ßǥȸ ³í¹®Áý (2011-11) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(256) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(8) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
ºûȯ°æ (Lighting environment) ; º£³×½Ã¾È ºí¶óÀεå (Venetian blind) ; Á¶¸íÁ¦¾î(Dimming control) ; °Ç¹°¿¡³ÊÁö¼Òºñ·® (Building Energy Consumption) ; 1Â÷ ¿¡³ÊÁö(primary energy) ; 2Â÷ ¿¡³ÊÁö (secondary energy) |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
Recently, curtain wall structure is constructed according to increasing high rise building. Glass is usually used in opening of curtain wall structure and window area ratio is finally increased. Excessive Daylighting and solar radiation by large window area ratio cause discomfort glare and add to cooling load in the case of office that is heavy on lighting and cooling. Therefore, this study suggests to use low transmittance window for solve those problems. Indoor lighting environment and building energy performance were analyzed by increasing transmittance from 10% to 90% and comparing fixed venetian blind. Consequently, the range of transmittance that is possible to daylighting and prevent discomfort glare. Secondary energy consumption is efficient in the case that transmittance is the range of from 20% to 50%, primary energy consumption is nice on from 20% to 40%. If those result put together, the range of window transmittance from 30% to 50% is proper in the office in lighting environment and energy consumption aspects. |