³í¹®¸í |
ÆÀÅÙ¿¡¼ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ÀÔüÀû ¸Þ°¡½ºÆ®·°ÃÄÀÇ °¡º¯¼º°ú À̵¿¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / Flexibility and Mobility of Multi-dimensional Mega-structure Shown in TeamX |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è, v.26 n.05 (2010-05) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(171) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(8) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
°¡º¯¼º ; À̵¿¼º ; ¸Þ°¡½ºÆ®·°ÃÄ ; ÀÔüÀû µµ½Ã ; º¸Çà³×Æ®¿öÅ© ; Flexibility ; Mobility ; Megastructure ; Pedestrian Network ; Multi-dimensional |
¿ä¾à2 |
This paper begins with the investigation of the background of Avant-garde architecture's theory covering ideal cities in 19C~20C. The main problems based on modern cities include human circumstance, infra, and high density of residence. Those issues have brought some changes, such as mega-structures through network, free-developing structures based on infra, and high density residence of new form. Ideal cities and Avant garde¡¯s experimental suggestions of 1960~70s produced several types of urban solution, such as Infrastructure¡¯s circulation, Flexible structures of high density, and Systematic multifunctional mega-structures. The purpose of this study is to clarify the meaning of ¡®Flexibility¡¯ and ¡®Mobility¡¯ of mega-structure design shown in the TeamX architecture movements and theories after CIAM. This study shows that they produced the mega-structures which have the possibility of being sustainable open structures and also shows the contribution for network system above existing urban fabric. In each case, they had a n important role in modern cities as a starting point to discuss the relationship between architecture and urban design fields having the issues of urban circulation and multi-dimensional pedestrian network. |