°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > ¿¬±¸³í¹® > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 100 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â Àοë

´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ|´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý ±¸Á¶°è 2010³â 3¿ù

³í¹®¸í ÀüÅë ¸ñ±¸Á¶ ÆÈÀÛÁöºØ Ãß³àºÎÀçÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû º¸°­ Ư¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / A Study on the Structural Strengthening Characteristic of Traditional Wooden Architecture Hip Rafter in Hipped-and-gabled Roof
ÀúÀÚ¸í Á¶Ã¶Èñ ; ½Å¿ë¼® ; Á¶À±Èñ ; ³ë¼º¿­½Äº°ÀúÀÚ ; ±èÁ¤¼·
¹ßÇà»ç ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý ±¸Á¶°è, v.26 n.03 (2010-03)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(3) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(8)
ISSN 12269107
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù ±¸Á¶
ÁÖÁ¦¾î ÀüÅë ¸ñ±¸Á¶ ; Ãß³à ; ±¸Á¶ º¸°­ ; ź¼Ò¼¶À¯¸·´ë ; Traditional Wooden Architecture ; Hip Rafter ; Structural Strengthening ; Carbon Fiber Bar
¿ä¾à2 These studies experimentally investigates structural behavior and reinforcing effects by strengthening the Carbon Fiber Bar overhanging length ratio of hip rafter in hipped-and-gabled roof house as follows. 1) As a result of hip rafter member test, it is found that reinforced specimen shows increased yield load by 4.1%¢¦45.8%, and ultimate load than non-reinforced standard specimen depending on the ratio of overhanging length by 0.6%¢¦47.7%. Also, in yield load, based on the ratio of overhanging length increases, load shows decrease of 6.7%¢¦32.2% in standard specimen and of 5.1%¢¦19.7% in reinforced specimen. 2) As a result of comparing standard specimen to reinforced specimen according to the ratio of overhanging length of hip rafter, Ductile Coefficient shows increase in reinforced specimen of ¥°-Type (1:1.0) by 17%¢¦26%, but Ductile Coefficient of standard specimen and reinforced specimen in ¥±-Type (1:1.2) and ¥²-Type (1:1.4) were similar. As a result of experiments and analysis with hip rafter member in traditional wooden structure, proposed retrofitting method with encased Carbon Fiber Bar is more rational than existing reinforcement methods such as slide installation, steel band reinforcement, plastering mud on the ceiling and core load adjustment and putting stone in the inside considering archetype preservation, structural safety and durability of cultural properties.
¼ÒÀåó ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
ºÐ¼®¼­Áö
°ÇÃ౸Á¶ > ±âŸ ¿¬±¸ºÐ¾ß > ±âŸ±¸Á¶Çü½Ä

º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â ÀüÅë ¸ñ±¸Á¶ °ÇÃ๰ ÆÈÀÛÁöºØÀÇ ±¸Á¶ºÎÀç Áß¿¡¼­ ±¸Á¶Àû ¿øÀο¡ ÀÇÇØ ¿ÜÃø óÁü ¹× ³»Ãø µ¹¸²ÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû °Åµ¿À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¼º´ÉÀúÇÏ Çö»óÀÌ ÀϾ´À Ãß³àºÎÀç¿¡ ´ëÇØ ±¸Á¶Àû °Åµ¿ÀÇ Æ¯¼º°ú º¸°­¹æ¹ý ¹× º¸°­È¿°ú µîÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ¿¬±¸¸¦ ¼öÇàÇÑ °á°ú¿¡ ´ëÇØ ±â¼úÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
¡á Ãßõ¹®Çå (ÀÌ ¹®Çå°ú °°ÀÌ º» ¹®Çå)
Á¶¼±Èı⠼±ÀÚ¿¬ Ä¡¸ñ±â¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
±è¿ÕÁ÷(Kim Wang-Jik) - ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.26 n.05 (201005)
Çѱ¹ ÀüÅë°ÇÃà ÆÈÀÛÁöºØÀÇ Ê­Ï°¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
¾çÀ翵(Yang Jae-Young) - ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.25 n.02 (200902)
Á¶¼±Èıâ ÁöºØ±¸Á¶ÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ½Ãµµ
±èµ¿¿í - °ÇÃ࿪»ç¿¬±¸(Çѱ¹°ÇÃ࿪»çÇÐȸÁö) : v.19 n.2(Åë±Ç 69È£) (201004)
¼þ·Ê¹®°ú ÈïÀÎÁö¹®ÀÇ ±¸Á¶Ã¼°è ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸
ÀÌ¿Õ±â(Lee Wang-Kee) ; ±è»óÁ¶(Kim Sang-Jo) - ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.24 n.8 (200808)
ðÈàØãÁÓÛ ñìöµÙÊðãËïõéÀÇ ï®ÊÇÝ» Ê­Ï°ÛöÀÇ Çü½Ä°ú ±¸Á¶Àû Ư¼º
ÀÌÀº¼ö(Lee Eun-Soo) ; È«º´È­(Hong Byung-Hwa) ; ±è¼º¿ì(Kim Sung-Woo) - ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.25 n.12 (200912)
°í·Á½Ã´ë ¸ñÁ¶°ÇÃà °á±¸±â¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
Ȳ¼¼¿Á ; ±èºÀ°Ç - Çѱ¹°ÇÃ࿪»çÇÐȸ Ãß°èÇмú¹ßÇ¥´ëȸ ³í¹®Áý : (200911)
¾ÈÃÊ°øÀÇ ¹ß»ý°ú º¯Ãµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
ÀÌÇý¸° ; ȲÁ¾±¹ - ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ Ãá°è ¿ì¼öÁ¹¾÷³í¹®Àü ¼ö»ó³í¹® °³¿äÁý : Á¦6ȸ (201004)
[³í¹®] ±Í°íÁÖ¹æ½ÄÀÇ Á¶¿µÀüÅë°ú ÀǹÌ
È«º´È­ ; ÀÌÀº¼ö - °ÇÃ࿪»ç¿¬±¸(Çѱ¹°ÇÃ࿪»çÇÐȸÁö) : v.19 n.3(Åë±Ç 70È£) (201006)
[ÀÚ·á] ÇÑ¿ÁÀÇ ¼³°è¿Í ½Ã°ø±â¹ý
±èµµ°æ - °ÇÃ࿪»ç¿¬±¸(Çѱ¹°ÇÃ࿪»çÇÐȸÁö) : v.17 n.6(Åë±Ç 61È£) (200812)
±Ù´ë±â ¸ñÁ¶ ÁöºØÆ®·¯½ºÀÇ À¯ÇüºÐ·ù ¹× Ư¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
¹Úâ¹ü(Park Chang-Beom) ; ±è¹Ì¿¬(Kim Mi-Yeon) ; ±èÅ¿µ(Kim Tai-Young) - ´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è : v.24 n.8 (200808)