| ³í¹®¸í |
º®Ã¼±¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ ºñź¼º ÇØ¼® ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁöÁø Ãë¾àµµ ºÐ¼® / Seismic Fragility Analysis for Inelastic Methods of Wall Structure / Á¦¥°-2ºÐ°ú Åä¸ñ±¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ ³»Áø¼³°è ¹× ³»Áø¼º´ÉÆò°¡¥± |
| ¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹ÁöÁø°øÇÐȸ Ãá°èÇмú¹ßǥȸ ³í¹®Áý (2010-03) |
| ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(69) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(6) |
| ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
fragility curve ; nonlinear dynamic analysis ; Displacement Coefficient Method ; Capacity Spectrum Method |
| ¿ä¾à2 |
Structural engineers need to estimate the seismic performance when design structures, and it asks them to finish it with simply and effectively methods as far as possible. But as present, most of practical engineers performed seismic fragility analysis (SFA) by nonlinear dynamic analysis with the earthquake ground motions. Ideally, the nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures should be performed considering the dynamic responses of the complete soil-structure system and the variability of seismic ground motion components.In response of this need, with the publication of the ATC-40 Report in 1996, the FEMA-440 Report in 2004, nonlinear static analysis procedures can be available to engineers providing efficient and useful tools for seismic design and both of ATC-40 and ATC-440 documents present similar performance-based methods that rely on nonlinear static analysis procedures for prediction of maximum inelastic deformations of structures. So, the well-known nonlinear static analysis method, Capacity Spectrum Method and Displacement Coefficient Method will be used in this dissertation to evaluate the responses and fragility curves(results of seismic fragility analysis) of wall structure used in this dissertation. |