³í¹®¸í |
µ¿¼±¿¬±¸¿Í ¹Ì¼ú°ü Àü½Ã°ø°£ / A Study about Circulation Route and Art Museum Exhibition Space |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
´ëÇÑ°ÇÃàÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý °èȹ°è, v.25 n.12 (2009-12) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(145) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(10) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
µ¿¼± ; ¹Ì¼ú°ü ; Àü½Ã°ø°£ ; ħÅõ¼º ; Circulation Route ; Art Museum ; Exhibition Space ; Permeable |
¿ä¾à2 |
This study aims to find out the meaning of art museum's circulation route. For such a study's purpose, survey the circulation route's study after Bruno Taut(Bruno Julius Florian Taut, 1880~1938) in 1927. And will use the following 3 types of classified circulation route suggested by Kim Dovey for this study. 1. The Liner Syntax (I called it ¡°ÀÏ·ÄÇü(ìéÖªúþ)¡± in this study) is en enfilade of spaces with controlled movement, which is common in traditional centers of power and in some modern retail building. 2. The fan (I called it ¡°¼±Çü(à¿úþ)¡± in this study) is characteristic of bureaucratic organizations with large number of cells controlled by hall. 3. The network Syntax (I called it ¡°È¯Çü(ü½úþ)¡± in this study) is defined by a choice of pathways and is often called permeability. The result show that the 3 types circulation route are used in art museum planning after 18c enlightenment ear's. This result is not pointed out in the former study. And this study clarifies that there is a reason of the planning for the Liner Syntax. Even if it is criticized recently because it controlled the movement of the art museum visitors. And should be understood such a network syntax's permeability in art museum's circulation route. |