³í¹®¸í |
¼³°èVE Á¦¾ÈÆò°¡ ÀýÂ÷ ¹× ¹æ¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ / A Study on Procedures and Methods for Evaluating VE Alternatives at Design Phase in Construction Projects |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
ÃÖÀμö ; ÇöâÅà ; È«ÅÂÈÆ ; ±èÀ±½Ä |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.10 No.4 (2009-07) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(129) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(10) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
Æò°¡Ç׸ñ ; Á¦¾ÈäÅÃÀýÂ÷ ; Æò°¡¹æ¹ý ; Ç¥ÁØÆò°¡½¬Æ® ; Evaluation Item ; Alternative Selection Procedures ; Evaluation Method ; Standard Evaluation Sheet |
¿ä¾à1 |
ÃÖ±Ù ±¹³» VE¿¡ °üÇÑ À̽´°¡ ´ëµÎµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿¬±¸°¡ È°¹ßÈ÷ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ±â´ÉºÐ¼® ¹× VEºÐ¼®ÀýÂ÷¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸¿¡ ¸Ó¹°·¯ ÀÖÀ» »ÓÀÌ°í, ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ Á¦¾È äÅÃÀ» À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ¹ÌÈíÇÑ ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ƯÈ÷ ¹ßÁÖÀÚÀÇ ÀÔÀå¿¡¼ ½ÇÇà´Ü°è ¾÷¹«Ã³¸®¿Í VEÈ°¼ºÈ¿¡ ÀÏÁ¶ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï, VEÇÁ·Î¼¼½º¿¡¼ Á¦¾ÈäÅà ¿©ºÎ¸¦ °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ÃÖÁ¾´Ü°èÀÇ Æò°¡ÀýÂ÷¿Í ±âÁØ¿¡ °üÇÑ Ã¼°èÀûÀÎ ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ¿ì¼±, ±¹³»¿Ü ¹®Çå°íÂû ¹× ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ÆľÇÇÏ°í °³¼±¹æÇâÀ» µµÃâÇÑ´Ù. À̾î¼, Á¦¾ÈäÅà ¿©ºÎ °áÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ ¼¼ºÎÀýÂ÷¸¦ ¼³Á¤ÇÏ°í Ç¥ÁØÆò°¡½¬Æ®¸¦ Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, º» ³í¹®Àº ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®ÀÇ ¼º°Ý¿¡ µû¶ó ¹ßÁÖÀÚ Ãø¿¡¼ ÀûÀýÈ÷ Á¶Á¤ÇÏ¿© Àû¿ëÇÑ´Ù¸é VE°ü¸®¾÷¹«¿¡ È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î È°¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
The role and importance of VE have been enlarged since VE application was mandatory by law in public sector in March, 2000. Public organizations have widened the technological horizon through VE competitions and applied VE technique to private investment projects. Many studies have been carried out on function analysis and VE procedure. In practice it is common that clients make a decision one-sidedly on whether or not VE proposals are selected. The VE procedure itself is not smooth. This study gives some suggestions on VE appraisal procedure and criteria at the last phase on VE process in order to smooth the progress of VE. The results of this study can be used as a tool to improve efficiency in the management of VE. |