| 논문명 |
사회적 통합·배제 지표 개발을 위한 연구 / The Development of Social Inclusion·Exclusion Indicators - Focused on the Permanent Rental Apartment Dwellers / 영구임대아파트 거주자를 중심으로 |
| 수록사항 |
한국주거학회논문집, v.19 n.6 (2008-12) |
| 주제어 |
사회적 통합 ; 사회적 배제 ; 사회적 통합·배제 지표 ; 영구임대아파트 ; Social Inclusion ; Social Exclusion ; Social Inclusion·Exclusion Index ; Permanent Rental Apartment |
| 요약2 |
This study was to develop the indicators for understanding social inclusion · exclusion of the dwellers living in permanent rental apartment, and to present a important base about priority order of national housing policy for social inclusion. The ultimate purpose of this study was to provide basic information for the development of permanent rental apartment renewal techniques. The first phase of the study was to review of the social inclusion · exclusion indicators mentioned in the literature. The indicators of EU (2001, 2006), KIHASA (2005), and Jehoel-Gijsbers & Brooman (2007), which were applied in many studies about social inclusion, or included various items about dwellers’ subjective attitudes, were selected to construct the framework for the study. On the basis of 3 kinds of indicators at the above, the dimensions of social inclusion · exclusion were categorized as material deprivation and access to social rights in an economicstructural exclusion view, and social participation and cultural normative accommodations in a socio-cultural exclusion view. And then, the domains of social inclusion · exclusion were decided as follows: income, employment, education service, housing, health, family networks and social networks. The detail contents of indicators were adopted from the prior studies as many as possible, and the dwellers’ subjective attitudes and housing domains were intensified with reference to UN housing rights and the study of “residents’ satisfaction of housing facilities living in permanent rental housing”. The developed indicators were modified through the advisory committee that consist of the specialists from the various fields of studies. The final indicators that were overlapped or not able to be measured were eliminated, and added, in a housing domain, the standards of convenient facilities, the management condition, safety, location, crime and etc. in the apartment complex, which were required to complement in the advisory committee. |
