³í¹®¸í |
±³À°½Ã¼³ BTL»ç¾÷ÀÇ À¯Áö°ü¸®ºñ¿ë ºñ±³ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÑ ºñ¿ëÃßÁ¤ °³¼±¹æ¾È¿¡ °üÇÑ »ç·Ê¿¬±¸ / A Case Study on the Improvement Plan for Cost Prediction of Educational BTL Project based on Running Cost Analysis |
ÀúÀÚ¸í |
¹Ú¹®¼± (Park, Moon-Sun) ; ¼Û⿵ (Song, Chang-Youg) ; ±è¿ë¼ö(Kim, Yong-Su) |
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áý, Vol.8 No.6 (2007-12) |
ÆäÀÌÁö |
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(139) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(11) |
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù |
½Ã°ø(Àû»ê) / ¹ý±Ô(Á¦µµ,Á¤Ã¥) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
À¯Áö°ü¸®ºñ¿ë ; BTL»ç¾÷ ; ±³À°½Ã¼³¹° ; Running Cost ; BTL Project ; Educational Facilities |
¿ä¾à1 |
º» ¿¬±¸´Â BTL»ç¾÷ ÃÊ?Áß?°í ±³À°½Ã¼³À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î À¯Áö°ü¸®ºñ¿ë ºñ±³ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ºÐ¼®Çϰí, ÇÕ´çÇÑ »ç¾÷ ±âÁØ Á¦½Ã¸¦ À§ÇÑ À¯Áö°ü¸®ºñ¿ë ÃßÁ¤¿¡ À¯¿ëÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇϰíÀÚ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© AÄÁ¼³ÆÃ ¾÷ü¿Í BÄÁ¼³ÆÃ ¾÷üÀÇ ÃÊ?Áß?°í ±³À°½Ã¼³À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼öµµ±Ç ¹× ºñ¼öµµ±Ç ÃÑ 8°³ Çб³¸¦ ¼±Á¤Çϰí À̸¦ 4°³ÀÇ »ç·Ê·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© À¯Áö°ü¸®ºñ¿ëÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, À̸¦ ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ó±â¿Í °°Àº ¸ñÀû°ú ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó ÁøÇàµÈ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù: 1)À¯Áö°ü¸®ºñ¿ëÀ» »ç·Ê ±×·ì º°·Î ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´°í, ±× °á°ú ÀΰǺñ, ¿ë¿ªºñ, ¾ÈÀüÁø´Üºñ, ´ë¼ö¼±ºñ, ´ëüºñ¿¡¼ ¾ç »ç¾÷ÀÚ°£ °¢ Ç׸ñº° ºñ¿ëÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. 2) BTL»ç¾÷ À¯Áö°ü¸®ºñ¿ëÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡ ¹× È¿À²ÀûÀÎ »ç¾÷±âÁØ Á¦½Ã¸¦ À§ÇÑ À¯Áö°ü¸®ºñ¿ë ÃßÁ¤ÀÇ °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀº ¹ßÁÖÀÚ¿Í Á¦¾ÈÀÚ·Î ºÐ·ùµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ±× »çÇ×Àº ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, ¹ßÁÖÀÚ´Â ¼º°ú¿ä±¸¼öÁؼÀÇ ¸íÈ®ÇÑ ±âÁØÀ» Á¦½Ã ¹× ´ë¼ö¼±ÀÇ Á¤¸³À» ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. µÑ°, Á¦¾È¼ÀÇ Æò°¡¸¦ ÀûÁ¤°¡°ÝÀ¸·Î À¯µµ ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Æò°¡±¸Á¶ÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ¼Â°, Á¦¾ÈÀÚ´Â »ç¿ëÀÚ ¹× ½Ã¼³À» À§ÇÑ À¯Áö°ü¸®ºñ¿ëÀ» »êÃâÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ³Ý°, »ç¾÷´Ü°èº° ¹®Á¦Á¡ ÆÄ¾ÇÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© ȸÀÇ·Ï ÀÛ¼º ¹× Á¦Ãâ°ú PM»çµéÀº Çùȸ, Á¶Á÷À» ¸¸µé¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. |
¿ä¾à2 |
The purpose of this study is to examine the problem of BTL(Build Transfer Lease) projects through comparative analysis onrunning costs, focusing on primary school, junior and senior high school education facilities, and then to provide usefulinformation on the estimation of running costs by suggesting valid cost criteria. For this, eight schools from A and B consultingfirms were sampled from capital region and other areas. Sampled schools were classified into four categories according toschool grade, and running cost data are collected and analyzed from relative view points. The results of this study are asfollows: 1) running costs which are analyzed by categories show some difference among sub-items, 2) major problems relatedto running cost prediction of BTL projects are revealed and improvement schemes are suggested for two groups (Owner andProject applicants). |