| 논문명 |
20세기 서양건축의 현상적(現象的) 전환에 관한 연구 / A Study on the phenomenal Transformation of the western Architecture in the 20th century : Focused on the Wall as Element of Architecture / 건축요소로서의 벽을 중심으로 |
| 수록사항 |
한국실내디자인학회 논문집, NO.20 (1999-09) |
| 요약1 |
완벽을 말 할 수 있는 건축 사조는 그 어느 시기도 이룰 수 없었지만 끝없이 수정되고 보완되며 또는 반대 성격의 냉정하고 강력한 비판에 의해 사라지기도 하지만 언젠가는 다시 의미를 회복하여 존재하는 이른 바 전환이 이루어지는 현상의 의미가 바로 20세기 현대건축에 뚜렷이 나타나고 있다. 따라서 지금의 현대건축이 보여주는 다양한 모습들은 그 동안 존재했던 건축에 있어서 모든 전환의 집합체이며 동시에 산물이라 말 할 수 있다. 그리고 이제는 첨단과학기술까지도 주요 사조로 합류하고 있음을 주시하게 된다. 건축이 시대의 반영물 이라는 대전제를 놓고 보더라도 현시대의 과학적 세계관은 간과할 수 없는 건축의 중요한 인자라 하겠다. ?(본문중에서) |
| 요약2 |
The western architecture is being transformed with the utmost rapidity in the 20th century. The architectural culture is strongly influenced by various thoughts and views on life of people. And then it would reflect the sprit of the same times. Architects have much imaginations that tend to limit of the present at a glance. However, if we observe these imaginations in detail, we can find that their imaginations are based on not only the utopian conceptions but abstract theories. And above all, these imaginations are an energy of conflict between the endless asking and the conviction against the traditions and history. The most of architects consider their ideology and conviction as a whole. Furthermore they regard the wall as a element of architecture and attempt to persuade the people through making the realization. In order to understand more easily the architectural characteristics, it is the best way to see the architecture at the high of our eyes. That is the reason why the wall was chosen as a element of architecture.Therefore the wall is the best material to understand the characteristics and the transformation of the western architecture of the 20th century.I would like to emphasize the architects who were the representative in their ages and their works that are based on the conceptions at that time. However, I didn't refer to make a comparison with qualities of them anywhere of this study. Because it is necessary that we should be accepted the architectural paradigm as a matter of course. |
