| 논문명 |
뮤지엄 전시디자인 평가방식 및 현황에 관한 연구 / A Study on the Museum Exhibition Evaluation Methods and the Status of Korean Exhibition Evaluation / 한국 역사계 뮤지엄과 전시전문회사의 사례연구를 중심으로 |
| 수록사항 |
한국실내디자인학회 논문집, NO.40 (2003-10) |
| 요약1 |
본 연구는 문헌고찰을 통해 평가방식의 이론들을 정리하고, 전시디자인에 과학적 평가방식에 대한 인식을 명확히 하여 체계화함을 목적으로 하였다. 또한 국내의 전시평가에 대한 인식 및 실천이 그 중요성에 비해서 크게 뒤쳐져 있음을 인식하고, 현재 실무를 담당하고 있는 뮤지엄 전문인들의 ‘전시평가’에 대한 인식과 현황을 분석하여 문제점 및 개선점들을 살펴보았다. |
| 요약2 |
If the collection of exhibit objects as well as exhibit planning are not in accord with the overall purpose of the exhibit, it will be difficult to attain satisfactory results. The present study focuses on the exhibit evaluation. The exhibit evaluation is very important because it allows the whole process of exhibit development to be reviewed, and it can point a way towards improving the exhibit. Research was conducted by literature review for the museum evaluation methods and by survey for the status of Korean exhibit evaluation. Several Korean History Museum Exhibitions were targeted as cases for this study. Structured and open-ended interviews with 70 museum specialists including curators and exhibit designers were conducted. In conclusion, museum evaluation methods were timely arranged first; front end analysis, second; formative evaluation, third; summative evaluation. Through the survey, one forth of museum specialist didn`t have the concept of the exhibit evaluation. However they felt the importance of it. |
