| 수록사항 |
건축역사연구(한국건축역사학회지) , v.11 n.1(2002-03) |
| 주제어 |
Tectonic ; Carlo Scarpa ; 디테일 ; 자료2 |
| 요약1 |
본 연구는 건축의 의미론적 측면에서 어원분석과 특히 철학가 마르틴 하이데거(Martin Heidegger)의 실존철학적 관점에서 ‘텍토닉’에 대한 본질성과 존재론적 의미를 해석해 보려 하며, 더 나아가 ‘제작의 예술’(art of making)로 잘 알려진 건축가 까를로 스카르파(Carlo Scarpa)의 작품을 통해 ‘텍토닉’ 특히 ‘조인트’(joint)에 대한 존재론적 실천행위가 작품에 어떠한 방식으로 나타나 있는지를 간략한 예를 통해 소개하고 해석해 보려한다. 본 연구는 결국 이러한 논의를 통해 현대건축이 보여주고 있는 심미적 상업화를 극복하고 나아가 지역적 전통의 현대적 계승을 이루어 낼 수 있는 가능한 방식을 인식론적 관점에서 제시해 보려는데 그 의의가 있다. |
| 요약2 |
The recently published papers and essays regarding 'tectonic' bring us to rumination of its importance on comprehending modern architectural process. Many architectural theorists may seem to seek the substance of architecture through the discussion of 'tectonic' for the purpose of overcoming the dilemma of representation which can be easily found in modern architectural forms. Their emphasizing on its double-faced aspect as the manner of representation, that is semantic and aesthetic, may imply the significance of philosophical approach especially to the recent architectural phenomena. From this point, it ought to be meaningful to manifest etymological connection between the terms with semantic analysis and interpret the substance and ontological meaning of 'tectonic' referring Martin Heidegger's existential philosophy. Besides the works of Carlo Scarpa, that are known as the art of making, are exampled to prove the way how the ontological meaning of practical act is exposed on an artwork.
The idea of 'tectonic' connotes not only technological aspect as construction of form and space, but also ontological aspect as joint or detail, that is the result of logos. The ‘tectonic’ means etymologically 'joint' having double-meaning structure, technology and aesthetics. It means 'detail' as minimum units of architectural form and as sites where making relationship or connection takes place in the way of ontological apprehension. The 'detail' as the place of innovation and invention implies the culture of an area, and expresses craftsmanship, which modern architecture buries in oblivion. This study aims to deviate from the aesthetical commercialization in which the modern architecture tends to fall, and further, propose the possible way to succeed traditional locality in an epistemological point of view. |
