¼ö·Ï»çÇ× |
°ÇÃ࿪»ç¿¬±¸(Çѱ¹°ÇÃ࿪»çÇÐȸÁö) , v.2 n.2(1993-12) |
ÁÖÁ¦¾î |
Çѱ¹ ; Çö´ë ; ±Ù´ë ; º£¸¦¶óÇì ; ¿ª»ç¼º ; Korean ; Modern ; Berlage ; ÀÚ·á2 |
¿ä¾à1 |
Berlage's importance in the history of the Modern Movements of Architecture lies in his effort to combine several sets of contradictory dual aspects of architectural values. Tra- dition and modernity are one of the contradictory dual aspects. For Berlage, tradtion and modernity were not tow opposing, but reconciliatory concepts. In this sense, Berlage thought that modernity did not mean a total rejection, but a reinterpretion of tradition. Berlage's concern with his contemporaty architectural situstion was how to revive the stag- nant repetion of past styles in Historicism and, at same time, how to prevent an extreme rejection of tradition by the Avant-Gardists. Berlage's architectural belief that neither stagnant imitation of past styles nor extreme revolution can be an ideal model for his era, lies in a traditional art theory of 'style evolution' and the interpertation of Nature's lessons for it. This study is to understand Berlage's concept of 'style evolution' and the meaning of tradition and modernity in the early Modern Movements of Architecture. |