°ÇÃ൵½Ã°ø°£¿¬±¸¼Ò

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

pdf¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿¡·¯ ÇØ°á¹æ¹ý ¹Ù·Î°¡±â



¹®ÇåȨ > Àú³Î > »ó¼¼

[¿ø¹®º¸±â½Ã ¼ÒºñµÇ´Â Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : 50 Æ÷ÀÎÆ®] ¹Ì¸®º¸±â

Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸ|µµ½Ã¼³°è(Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸÁö) 2024³â 10¿ù

±â»ç¸í Á¦µµ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ÇÁ¶óÀÓ ¿ÀÇǽºÀÇ °ø°³°øÁö ±¸¼º ¹æ½Ä°ú °ø°ø¼º º¯È­ºÐ¼® - ¼­¿ïƯº°½Ã Á¾·Î±¸¤ýÁß±¸¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î / Analysis of Configuration and Public Value of Privately Owned Public Spaces (POPS) in Prime Offices under Institutional Changes - With Special Emphasis on Jongno-gu & Jung-gu in Seoul
ÀúÀÚ¸í ÀÌÁöȯ(Lee, Ji-Hwan) ; ±Ç¿µ»ó(Kwon, Young-Sang) ; ±è¼ºÅÂ(Kim, Sung-Tae)
¹ßÇà»ç Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸ
¼ö·Ï»çÇ× µµ½Ã¼³°è(Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸÁö) , Vol.25 No.5(Åë±Ç Á¦125È£)(2024-10)
ÆäÀÌÁö ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö(101) ÃÑÆäÀÌÁö(20)
ISSN 15980650
ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ·ù µµ½Ã
ÁÖÁ¦¾î Á¦µµ º¯È­; ÇÁ¶óÀÓ ¿ÀÇǽº; °ø°³°øÁö; °ø°ø¼º; µµ½ÉºÎ; ½ÇÁõ»ç·Ê¿¬±¸ ; Institutional Change; Prime Office; Privately Owned Public Space(POPS); Public Value; CBD; Case Study
¿ä¾à1 º» ¿¬±¸´Â Á¦µµ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ÇÁ¶óÀÓ ¿ÀÇǽºÀÇ °ø°³°øÁö ±¸¼º ¹æ½ÄÀ» Á¢±Ù¼º,?? Æí¸®¼º,?? °³¹æ¼ºÀÇ °ø°ø¼º °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ »ìÆ캸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.?? À̸¦ À§ÇØ 1991³âºÎÅÍ 2022³â±îÁö Á¾·Î±¸¤ýÁß±¸ÀÇ ÇÁ¶óÀÓ ¿ÀÇǽº 30°³ µ¿ Àü¼ö¸¦ ÆľÇ,?? ¹®Çå Á¶»ç ¹× ÇöÀå ´ä»ç,?? °ø°øµ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ º¯È­ Ư¼ºÀ» µµÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù.?? ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú,?? ù°,?? °ü·Ã Á¦µµÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¶ó ÇÁ¶óÀÓ ¿ÀÇǽºÀÇ °ø°³°øÁö ¸éÀû°ú°ø°³°øÁöÀ²ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í,?? ´Ù¾çÇÑ ½Ã¼³¹° µµÀÔÀ¸·Î ½Ã¹Îµé¿¡°Ô ÆíÀǼºÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿´´Ù.?? µÑ°,?? ´ëÁß±³Åë ¹× ÁÖº¯ ȯ°æ°ú ¿¬°èÇÏ¿© °ø°³°øÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¢±Ù¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÌ´Â ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î °èȹÀÇ ¹æÇâÀÌ º¯ÇÏ¿´À½À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.?? ¼Â°,?? µµ½ÃÀû ¸Æ¶ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °ø°³°øÁö´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇüÅ·ΠÁ¶¼ºµÇ¸ç,?? °Ç¹° ÀúÃþºÎ¿ÍÀÇ ¿¬°è¸¦ ÅëÇØ °³¹æ¼ºÀ» È®º¸ÇÏ°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.?? º» ¿¬±¸´Â µµ½ÉºÎ ÇÁ¶óÀÓ ¿ÀÇǽºÀÇ °ø°³°øÁö Á¶¼ºÀÇ °æÇ⼺°ú ±× ¿øÀο¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Åë½ÃÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÑ Á¡¿¡¼­ ÀÇÀÇ°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç,?? ÇâÈÄ °ø°³°øÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑÁ¤Ã¥ ¼ö¸³°ú ´ë±Ô¸ð ¿ÀÇǽºÀÇ ¿ÜºÎ °ø°£À» °èȹÇϴµ¥ ±âÃÊ ÀÚ·á·Î È°¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
¿ä¾à2 This study aims to examine the configurations of privately owned public spaces(POPS) in prime offices, considering changes in institutional regulations from the perspective of public value, in terms of accessibility, convenience, and openness. The characteristics of changes were derived through literature review, field surveys, and public-data analysis, focusing on the POPS of 30 prime offices(between 1991 and 2022). The findings obtained are as follows. First, owing to changes in relevant regulations, both the area and proportion of POPS in prime offices increased. Additionally, the introduction of various facilities enhanced convenience to the public. Second, the planning direction shifted toward improving accessibility to POPS by integrating them with public transportation and the surrounding environment. Third, POPS are developed in various forms based on the urban context, and their openness is ensured through their integration with the lower floors of buildings. This study is beneficial as it provides a diachronic analysis of the trends and causes related to the formation of POPS in prime offices in urban areas.
¼ÒÀåó Çѱ¹µµ½Ã¼³°èÇÐȸ
¾ð¾î Çѱ¹¾î
DOI https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2024.10.25.5.101